Featured Article

Chemical Dynamic Thermodynamic Resolution and S/R Interconversion of Unprotected Unnatural Tailor-made α-Amino Acids

CAS Key Laboratory of Receptor Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 555 Zuchongzhi Road, Shanghai 201203, China
Hamari Chemicals Ltd., 1-4-29 Kunijima, Higashi-Yodogawa-ku, Osaka 533-0024, Japan
§ Department of Organic Chemistry I, Faculty of Chemistry, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Paseo Manuel Lardizábal 3, 20018 San Sebastián, Spain
|| IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, Alameda Urquijo 36-5, Plaza Bizkaia, 48011 Bilbao, Spain
J. Org. Chem., 2015, 80 (20), pp 9817–9830
DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.5b01292
Publication Date (Web): September 9, 2015
Copyright © 2015 American Chemical Society
ACS Editors' Choice - This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License, which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes.

Abstract

Abstract Image

Described here is an advanced, general method for purely chemical dynamic thermodynamic resolution and S/R interconversion of unprotected tailor-made α-amino acids (α-AAs) through intermediate formation of the corresponding nickel(II)-chelated Schiff bases. The method features virtually complete stereochemical outcome, broad substrate generality (35 examples), and operationally convenient conditions allowing for large-scale preparation of the target α-AAs in enantiomerically pure form. Furthermore, the new type of nonracemizable axially chiral ligands can be quantitatively recycled and reused, rendering the whole process economically and synthetically attractive.

Introduction


Interest in the development of new methods for preparation of tailor-made α-amino acids (α-AAs) in enantiomerically pure form is at an all-time high, because of their ever-increasing applications in pharmaceutical and healthcare industries.(1, 2) In particular, the area of peptide-based drugs is the most promising and fast-growing sector in the new pharmaceuticals design. Currently, substitution of a natural α-AA by an unnatural, tailor-made analogue in polypeptide drugs is a widely used approach to overcome the disadvantages related to poor chemical and pharmacokinetic profiles of natural polypeptides. High pharmaceutical potential of unnatural, tailor-made α-AAs can be best illustrated using examples of the most recently developed very successful drugs. For instance, telaprevir (1) (Figure 1) is an all-tailor-made α-AAs tetrapeptide possessing remarkably strong anti-HCV activity.(3) Degarelix (2), a polypeptide containing six key tailor-made α-AA residues, is an exceptionally selective gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor antagonist, prescribed for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer.(4) Both drugs were developed starting from all-natural AAs peptides using tailor-made α-AA scan approach. Another notable example of a powerful peptide-based drug is carfilzomib (3), which was developed from the natural product epoxomicin.(5) Substitution of phenylalanine for tailor-made homophenylalanine resulted in a remarkable activity of 3 as a chymotrypsin-like protease inhibitor. Furthermore, besides peptide-based drugs, there are a number of important low molecular weight drugs containing fragments of tailor-made α-AAs, for example, DPP-IV inhibitor saxagliptin (4) and antiepileptic agent lacosamide (5) (Figure 1).(6, 7)
figure

Figure 1. Structures of current representative pharmaceuticals containing tailor-made α-AAs.

Considering the pharmaceutical potential of unnatural, tailor-made α-AAs, the development of new approaches for preparation of structurally varied AAs in enantiomerically pure form has been one of the most actively studied areas of organic synthesis.(8, 9) The current wealth of synthetic methodology allows for preparation of virtually any structurally or stereochemically complex α-AAs. On the other hand, the aspects of practicality and cost of target α-AAs have often been neglected rendering the known chemical methods prohibitively expensive even for gram-scale preparations.(10) Consequently, the cost-per-structure issue is currently the major key factor in the quality assessment of a new synthetic method. Particularly, high yields and degree of stereocontrol accessible under operationally convenient conditions, such as an easily maintainable temperature and the use of air- and moisture-stable reagents, are unarguably essential requirements of a truly practical synthetic method.(11)
Considering the subject of preparation of enantiomerically pure α-AAs from the stand point of practicality, it might be a general consensus that resolution of racemic α-AAs (rac-α-AAs); in particular, dynamic resolution is the most economically feasible approach, including dynamic kinetic resolution (DKR) and dynamic thermodynamic resolution (DTR). DKR of rac-α-AAs is mainly dominated by the enzymatic approaches, while chemical methods, despite the intellectual brilliance and reaction ingenuity, play a rather ornamental role. For example, state-of-the-art enzymatic approach (Scheme 1) can involve up to three biocatalytic reactions including racemization, kinetic resolution, and deprotection stages.(12) However, the whole process requires a purely chemical step for proper protection of the starting rac-α-AAs 6.
figure
Scheme 1. General Biocatalytic Approach for DKR of Protected rac-α-AA Derivatives
In the field of nonenzymatic, chemical DKR of rac-α-AAs,(13, 14) one of the outstanding methods is a catalytic alcoholytic opening of oxazol-5(4H)-ones (Scheme 2).(15) This approach makes use of very high C–H acidity and reactivity of oxazolones 11, 12 allowing for quite efficient racemization and catalytic ring opening under very mild conditions. This process also necessitates special preparation of oxazolones 11, 12, and deprotection of the intermediate derivatives 14.
figure
Scheme 2. Example of Chemical Approach for DKR of Protected rac-α-AA Derivatives
Nevertheless, the direct dynamic resolution of unprotected α-AAs is difficult to realize, and there are only two literature precedents based on the application of chiral ligands 15 and 16 that could achieve this (Figure 2).(16) Both methods are purely chemical and make use of in situ formation of the corresponding Schiff bases starting from unprotected α-AAs. While these reports have made a significant methodological breakthrough, the synthetic value of ligands 15 and 16 is rather limited due to the lack of substrate generality and incomplete stereochemical outcome.
Consistent with our longstanding interest in the development of synthetic methods for preparation of tailor-made amino acids,(17) we have developed a modular approach for the design of new ligands and the corresponding Ni(II) complexes for general asymmetric synthesis of α- and β-AAs.(18) One of the major breakthroughs in this research is the development of specially designed, axially chiral ligands (S)- and (R)-17 (Figure 2) and their use for DTR of several natural proteinogenic α-AAs based on thermodynamic equilibration of diastereomeric products.(19-21) Here, we report a detailed account of our research on the application of (S)- and (R)-17 for general DTR of unprotected rac-α-AAs. Furthermore, we demonstrate that ligands (S)- and (R)-17 can also be used for S/R interconversion of unprotected α-AAs, underscoring synthetic range and flexibility of this approach. In the present work, we focus entirely on unnatural, tailor-made α-AAs of high pharmaceutical potential. We demonstrate a remarkable generality of this method using 35 examples of polyfunctional, structurally varied α-AAs and provide detailed mechanistic rationale for the observed thermodynamically controlled stereochemical outcome. The chemical process presented in this paper features virtually complete yields and diastereoselectivity, fully recyclable chiral ligands (S)- and (R)-17, and operationally simple reaction conditions.
figure

Figure 2. Structural types of the known ligands 15 and 16 and the new ligand 17 for direct dynamic resolution of unprotected α-AAs.

Results and Discussion


Synthesis of Axially Chiral Ligands
Synthesis of ligands (S)- and (R)-17 (Scheme 3) is a very straightforward two-step process involving high-yielding reactions. The first step, the acylation of 2-amino-5-chlorobenzophenone 18 with bromoacetyl bromide 19, is conducted at ambient temperature affording the intermediate amide 20 in a high yield. The second step is N-alkylation of enantiomerically pure axially chiral secondary amine 21 with amide 20, which proceeds at room temperature with a quantitative yield. Enantiomerically pure amines (S)- and (R)-21 can be reliably prepared on a large scale by resolution of inexpensive racemic 21 with l-(−)-tartaric acid.(22) The whole procedure is noticeably very simple and operationally convenient and can be reproduced on > 300 g scale. For the large-scale synthesis, this route can be conducted as a one-pot process without purification of amide 20 affording ligands (S)- and (R)-17 of at least, 85% chemical purity, which can be directly used for the DTR or S/R interconversion of tailor-made α-AAs.
figure
Scheme 3. Synthesis of Axially Chiral Ligands (S)- and (R)-17
Application of Ligands (S)- and (R)-17 for DTR of Tailor-made rac-α-AAs
With the aim of optimizing the reaction conditions and understanding the mode of stereochemical preferences, we conducted a series of experiments carefully monitoring the reaction composition over time using HPLC analysis. As a representative example, we selected multifunctional rac-6-Cl-tryptophan 22a (Figure 3). The reaction between ligand (R)-17 and unprotected rac-22a was conducted in methanol at 40 °C, using Ni(OAc)2·4H2O and K2CO3 as a base. As one can see from Figure 3, on the early reaction stage the ratio between diastereomers (Ra)(Sc)-23a and (Ra)(Rc)-23a was about 3:1, indicating rather low kinetic stereoselectivity. However, with the reaction progress over time, the amount of major diastereomer (Ra)(Sc)-23a was rapidly increasing while the quantity of minor stereoisomer (Ra)(Rc)-23a was correspondingly decreasing. Thus, at nearly 90% conversion of starting ligand (R)-17, the ratio (Ra)(Sc)-23a/(Ra)(Rc)-23a was about 9:1, clearly suggesting that the former diastereomer is the thermodynamically preferred product. Final thermodynamic control was achieved after almost 48 h, furnishing diastereomers (Ra)(Sc)-23a and (Ra)(Rc)-23a in a ratio of 99.54:0.46 (see Table S1, Supporting Information). Major product (Ra)(Sc)-23a was isolated in diastereomerically pure form (> 99% de) with an excellent 97% yield. It can be reasonably assumed that under the reaction conditions minor diastereomer (Ra)(Rc)-23a undergoes base-catalyzed α-epimerization, via the corresponding intermediate enolate to form the thermodynamic product (Ra)(Sc)-23a (see Figure S1, Supporting Information).
figure

Figure 3. Reaction of ligand (R)-17 with rac-6-Cl-tryptophan 22a.

Additional optimization of the reaction conditions revealed that the thermodynamic control can be considerably accelerated at elevated temperatures; in particular, 70 °C was found to be most optimal, as virtually no byproducts were detected in the crude reaction mixture. Furthermore, we found that only 10% excess of both the rac-α-AA and Ni(OAc)2·4H2O is needed for optimal reaction rates and complete consumption of the starting ligand (R)-17. Using these standard conditions, we advanced to the substrate generality study, and the most representative results are collected in Table 1.
Table 1. DTR of Unprotected Tailor-made rac-α-AAs 22add with Axially Chiral Ligand (S)- or (R)-17a
Table a

Reaction conditions: (S)-17 or (R)-17 (0.176 mmol), rac-α-AAs 22 (0.194 mmol), Ni(OAc)2·4H2O (0.194 mmol), and K2CO3 (1.06 mmol) were refluxed in methanol (6 mL) at 70 °C for 2–36 h.

Table b

Combined yield of isolated product 23.

Table c

Determined by LC/MS analysis of the crude reaction mixtures.

Table d

Reactions rate was relatively high; therefore, the reactions were conducted at 40 °C.

Table e

The reaction was performed with 500 mg of ligand (S)-17 for the following disassembly process.

Table f

The reaction was reproduced on a largescale starting with 10 g of ligand (S)-17 (97% yield, > 99:1 dr).

Phenylalanine (Phe) derivatives represent one of the most frequently used types of tailor-made α-AAs for modification of natural peptides.(4, 5) Therefore, we decided to study relatively large series of various phenylalanine derivatives rac-22bm. The reactions of ligand (S)-17 with unprotected ortho-substituted phenylalanines rac-22be gave rise to products (Sa)(Rc)-23 with very good stereochemical outcomes (entries 2–5). The level of diastereoselectivity, ranging from 92 to 99% de, was rather in line with the optimized reaction (entry 1). On the other hand, the variable yields may be attributed to generally lower reaction rates due to the steric effect of the ortho substituents. In agreement with assumption, the yields obtained in the reactions of ligand (S)-17 with meta-substituted derivatives rac-22fh were truly excellent, although the diastereoselectivity was a bit lower (entries 6–8). Virtually quantitative yields were also obtained in the reactions of para-substituted phenylalanines rac-22im with ligand (S)-17 (entries 9–13), with the exception of the p-acetyl group containing rac-22m (78%, entry 13). In this case, the lower yield might be explained by rather special physicochemical properties of the products due to the very polar nature of acetyl moiety. Importantly, in this series of tailor-made phenylalanine derivatives neither electronic nor steric properties of the substituents did not show any apparent effects on the stereochemical outcome of the reactions. In particular, we would like to mention excellent stereochemical outcomes observed in the reactions of ligand (S)-17 with rac-22d,g (entries 4 and 7), bearing free hydroxyl group, which usually require proper protection in the corresponding enzymatic methods. Another example worth mentioning is the DTR of p-Cl-phenylalanine rac-22j, used in the design of degarelix (2) (Figure 1).(4) Using our method, this α-AA can be prepared quite efficiently (yield 99% with 98% de; entry 10) in both enantiomeric forms.
Another structural group of α-AAs used in this study are polyaromatic derivatives represented by β-naphthylalanine rac-22n, used in the design of degarelix (2) (Figure 1)(4) and p-phenyl-phenylalanine rac-22o (entries 14 and 15). The corresponding reactions with ligand (S)-17 proceeded with excellent stereochemical outcomes allowing preparation of target products (Sa)(Rc)-23n,o in diastereomerically pure form with 98% yield. Tailor-made α-AAs containing aromatic heterocyclic moieties are usually quite formidable targets, but they are in great demand as key structural features in the design of peptide-based drugs.(4) To explore this special structural type, we selected four α-AAs rac-22ps and performed their reactions with both (S)- and (R)-17. The results obtained were exceptionally good in terms of both diastereoselectivity and chemical yields (entries 16–19). One more unusual and synthetically challenging structural type of tailor-made α-AAs is represented by allyl group containing rac-22t,u (entries 20 and 21). Gratifyingly, we found that the reactions of unprotected rac-22t,u with ligand (R)-17 proceeded quite smoothly, affording products (Ra)(Sc)-23t,u with excellent stereochemical outcomes. Another relatively large group of tailor-made α-AAs studied in this work represents aliphatic derivatives containing various linear as well as sterically constrained cyclic fragments. For example, unprotected rac-22v,w (entries 22, 23), bearing cyclopropyl and -hexyl rings, reacted with (S)-configured ligand 17 exceptionally well, furnishing major diastereomers (Sa)(Rc)-23v,w with excellent yields and stereoselectivity. On the other hand, the reactions of α-AAs rac-22xz, bearing linear alkyl groups (entries 24–26), and rac-22aa, possessing a phenethyl moiety (entry 27), also gave satisfactory yields and stereoselectivity. Of particular interest was the reaction of α-AA rac-22bb containing a sterically constrained cyclobutyl ring (entry 28). The outcome was quite satisfactory, affording diastereomer (Sa)(Rc)-23bb in a very good yield and diastereomeric excess. Finally, we believe it is very important to mention a few less successful results pointing to some limitations of this method. For example, the reaction of sterically bulky rac-tert-leucine 22cc with ligand (R)-17 proceeded at slow rate and with far from incomplete thermodynamic control (entry 29). On the other hand, rac-phenylglycine 22dd (entry 30) reacted with ligand (S)-17 at a rather good rate but with noticeably lower diastereoselectivity. Taking advantage of the nearly perfect stereochemical outcome in the case of cyclo-hexane containing AA rac-22w (entry 23), we performed large-scale experiments using 10 g of the starting ligand (S)-17. The reaction proceeded without any complications to furnish diastereomerically pure (Sa)(Rc)-23w with 94% isolated yield.
To conclude this part of the study, we emphasize that axially chiral ligands (S)- and (R)-17 were evidently proven to be very efficient reagents for direct DTR of various unprotected tailor-made rac-α-AAs. In most of the cases reported in Table 1, the reactions took place under operationally convenient conditions to afford the major products with synthetically valuable diastereoselectivity and chemical yields. It should be mentioned that due to the significant differences in physicochemical properties between major (Sa)(Rc)-23 and minor (Sa)(Sc)-23 diastereomers, the purification of the former can be readily achieved by recrystallization or regular gravity-driven column chromatography.
Application of Ligands (S)- and (R)-17 for S/R Interconversion of Tailor-made α-AAs
Inspired by the exciting results obtained for the DTR of tailor-made rac-α-AAs, we decided to explore an additional methodological opportunity such as S/R interconversion of α-AAs. Compared to the DTR of rac-α-AAs, conversion of (S)-α-AAs to (R) enantiomers and vice versa is obviously of much lesser general use for production of enantiomerically pure α-AAs. However, in some cases, such as utilization of undesired enantiomers, availability of the S/R-interconversion method can be of critical practical importance. Furthermore, a synthetic concept allowing the use of the same chiral ligands, reagents, and even conditions to pursue simply by choice of either DTR or S/R interconversion has never been realized to date. Thus, the obvious novelty of this idea was an additional motivation to conduct the present study.
As we did in the research on DTR, we decided to investigate first the reaction progress and the chemical composition over time. As a model reaction, we chose (R)-6-Cl-tryptophan 22a as the expected products (Ra)(Sc)-23a and (Ra)(Rc)-23a were already characterized and monitored by HPLC (Table S2). The reaction of (R)-22a with ligand (R)-17 was conducted under the standard conditions: heating reagents in methanol at 40 °C. Composition of starting ligand (R)-17 and products (Ra)(Sc)-23a and (Ra)(Rc)-23a were carefully monitored by HPLC analysis; the results are presented in Figure 4.
figure

Figure 4. Reaction of ligand (R)-17 with (R)-22a: progress and stereochemical outcome over time.

As expected, diastereomer (Ra)(Rc)-23a was a kinetic product on the early reaction stage. From the data obtained, it was apparently clear that the rate of (Ra)(Rc)-23a formation was a bit faster than the rate of its based-catalyzed α-epimerization (via intermediate enolate) to form the thermodynamic product (Ra)(Sc)-23a, rendering (Ra)(Rc)-23a as a major product until about 50% consumption of the starting ligand (R)-17. However, quite rapidly the relative amounts of (Ra)(Rc)-23a were gradually decreasing, while diastereomer (Ra)(Sc)-23a became a major product after about 1.5 h of reaction time. Ultimately, after 33 h under full thermodynamic control, kinetic (Ra)(Rc)-23a was virtually completely transformed to (Ra)(Sc)-23a with a final ratio of 99.63:0.37 (see Table S2, Supporting Information).
With these data in hand, we next proceeded to study the substrate generality of the S/R-interconversion method; some selected results are presented in Table 2.
Table 2. S/R Interconversion of Unprotected Tailor-made α-AAs Using Ligand (S)- or (R)-17a
Table a

Reaction conditions: (S)-17 or (R)-17 (0.176 mmol), (S)- or (R)-α-AAs 22 (0.194 mmol), Ni(OAc)2·4H2O (0.194 mmol), and K2CO3 (1.06 mmol) were refluxed in methanol (6 mL) for 2–28 h.

Table b

Combined yield of isolated product 23.

Table c

Determined by LC/MS analysis of the crude reaction mixtures.

Table d

Reactions conducted at 40 °C.

Table e

The reaction was performed with 500 mg of ligand (R)-17 for the following disassembly process.

First, we reproduced the above-described procedure using optically pure AA 22a and ligand 17 of both opposite absolute configurations. The reaction of ligand (S)-17 with (S)-configured 22a gave a virtually identical stereochemical outcome allowing preparation of product (Sa)(Rc)-23a with virtually complete chemical yield and diastereoselectivity (entry 1 vs 2). Similarly excellent results were obtained in the reactions of 4-Cl-Phe (S)-22j (entry 3) and 4-Me-Phe (S)-22ee (entry 4) with ligand (S)-17 furnishing diastereomerically pure products (Sa)(Rc)-23j,ee. An interesting example of disubstituted derivative 3,4-difluoro-Phe 22ff is presented in entry 5. In this case, the reaction of (R)-22ff with (R)-17 resulted in a complete inversion of the α-configuration giving rise to complex (Ra)(Sc)-23ff with an excellent yield and stereoselectivity. Sterically bulky β-Ph-Phe (S)-22gg reacted with ligand (S)-17 at relatively high rate; however, the diastereoselectivity was less than expected (entry 6). Three more examples featuring (R)-to-(S) conversion of thienylalanine (R)-22hh (entry 7), propargylglycine (R)-22ii (entry 8), and (S)-to-(R) transformation of n-butylglycine (S)-22y (entry 9) provide some additional evidence of the wide range of structural generality of this method.
Disassembly of Products 23, Isolation of Free Amino Acids 22, and Recovery/Reuse of Chiral Ligands 17
To demonstrate the isolation of free α-AAs from products 23, we selected para-Cl-Phe (R)-22j (Scheme 4) of known pharmaceutical importance,(4) quite interesting long-chain n-butyl (R)-24y, and sterically constrained cyclobutyl (R)-24bb containing AAs, as well as an example of heterocyclic thienylalanine (S)-22hh, representing both the DTR and S/R-interconversion approaches. Disassembly of Ni(II) complexes of amino acid Schiff bases is usually conducted under acidic conditions with an option to isolate the target free amino acid or conduct its N-derivatization in situ.(8) Taking advantage of the truly exceptional stereochemical outcome (DTR approach; Table 1, entry 10) obtained in the preparation of (Sa)(Rc)-23j, we performed its disassembly without any additional purification. Due to a relatively high solubility of Ni(II) complex (Sa)(Rc)-23j in methanol (Scheme 4), its disassembly under the action of 6 N HCl occurred at very high rate to afford enantiomerically pure (> 99% ee) free (R)-4-Cl-phenylalanine 22j in an excellent isolated yield (95%). Similarly, diastereomerically pure Ni(II) complexes (Sa)(Rc)-23y, (Sa)(Rc)-23bb, obtained using DTR and (Ra)(Sc)-23hh, using the S/R-interconversion approach, were disassembled to furnish free amino acids (R)-22y, (R)-22bb, and (S)-22hh in > 90% yields.
figure
Scheme 4. Disassembly of (Sa)(Rc)-23j,y,bb, and (Ra)(Sc)-hh: Isolation of the Target AAs (R)-22j,y,bb and (S)-22hh, Recycling, and Reuse of the Chiral Ligands (S)-17 and (R)-17
It should be emphasized that along with the target AAs (R)-22j,y,bb and (S)-22hh, ligands (S)-17 and (R)-17 were virtually quantitatively (>95% yield) recovered. Without any additional purification, ligands (S)-17 and (R)-17 can be successfully reused for DTR or S/R interconversion of any target α-AA. One may agree that convenient recycling and reuse of the chiral ligands 17 render the present approach economically very attractive, surpassing efficiency and practicality of biocatalytic approaches.
Assignment of the Absolute Configurations and Rationale for the Observed Stereochemical Outcome
The absolute configuration of α-AA residues in products (Sa)(Rc)-23j,y,bb and (Ra)(Sc)-23hh was made by comparison of the optical properties of isolated AAs (R)-22j,y,bb and (S)-22hh with the literature data. Furthermore, we performed a crystallographic analysis of Ni(II) complex 23j, confirming its (Sa)(Rc) configuration (see CIF and Figure S2 in the Supporting Information). Stereochemistry of other products 23ai,kx,zaa,ccgg, was assigned on the basis of their matching spectroscopic and optical properties with complexes (Sa)(Rc)-23j,y,bb and (Ra)(Sc)-23hh.
The crystallographic structure of Ni(II) complex (Sa)(Rc)-23j, containing a (R)-4-Cl-Phe moiety, has several unexpected, rather unique features.(23) First, strikingly, there are no stereochemical contacts between the chiral auxiliary’s bisnaphthyl frame and the amino acid residue. What is evident from the structure is that the observed preference for the (R) absolute configuration of the (R)-4-Cl-Phe moiety is not directly controlled by the chiral auxiliary. Another prominent peculiarity of the crystallographic structure of (Sa)(Rc)-23j is a notably severe twisting of the chelate rings around the Ni(II). Thus, while the coordination to Ni(II) by the three nitrogen and one oxygen atoms is nearly perfectly coplanar, the chelate rings A, B, and C (Figure 5) are noticeably puckered out of this plane. In particular, the ring A is puckered up above the plane, showing a torsion angle (N–Ni–N–CH2) of 36.10°. By contrast, the ring B is puckered down out of this plane with a torsion angle (N–Ni–N–-C) of −30.19°. Subsequently, the ring C is puckered up above the plane. As a result of this sterically congested arrangement, the benzophenone phenyl ring is skewed by −70.65° and located right below the chelate ring C. The distance between the phenyl ortho-hydrogen and the hydrogen of the amino acid C–H group is only 2.38 Å, strongly indicating that the position of the 4-Cl-benzyl group up and away from the phenyl is the only stereochemically feasible option. On the basis of these structural features, one can assume the following mode of the observed stereocontrol. First, the helical chirality of the bisnaphthyl moiety induces the chiral puckering of the three chelate rings A, B, and C up and down the Ni(II) coordination plane. Second, the phenyl group of the ring B is positioned underneath the amino acid bearing ring C, forcing the R substituent to be pointed in the opposite direction, avoiding any repulsive stereochemical interactions. One might agree that this type of indirect asymmetric induction is rather distinctive to these Ni(II) complexes.
figure

Figure 5. Mechanistic rationale for the observed stereochemical outcome in the DTR and S/R-interconversion methods.

Conclusions


In summary, we have developed an advanced purely chemical DTR and S/R-interconversion methods for preparation of tailor-made, unnatural α-AAs using novel axially chiral ligands (S)- and (R)-17. These approaches can be used starting directly from unprotected α-AAs. All reactions can be conducted under operationally convenient conditions with good-to-excellent chemical yields and stereoselectivity (up to > 99:1). These methods show broad structural generality as demonstrated on 35 examples including various α-benzyl-, α-alkyl-, α-alkenyl, and α-heteroaryl-containing tailor-made α-AAs. The source of chirality in the presented methods, specially designed chiral and nonracemizable ligands (S)-17 and (R)-17, can be virtually completely recycled and reused for continuous production of the target enantiomerically pure α-AAs. Overall, the operational ease of the presented methods coupled with structural generality and attractive stereochemical outcome bode well for their widespread practical applications.

Experimental Section


General Information
The chemicals were purchased from commercial sources and used without further purification. Analytical thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed on HSGF 254 (0.15–0.2 mm thickness). All products were characterized by NMR and MS spectra. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded in deuterochloroform (CDCl3), dimethyl sulfoxide-d6 (DMSO-d6), or deuterium oxide (D2O) on a 400 or 500 MHz instrument. Chemical shifts were reported in parts per million (ppm, δ) downfield from tetramethylsilane. Proton coupling patterns were described as singlet (s), doublet (d), triplet (t), quartet (q), quintet (p), doublet of triplets (dt), and multiplet (m). High-resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were measured on a Q-TOF spectrometer. The determination of dr was performed via LC/MS analysis. The determination of ee was performed via HPLC analysis or UFLC analysis. Optical rotations were measured using a 1 mL cell with a 10 mm path length on an automatic polarimeter and were reported as follows: [α]25D (c: g/100 mL, in solvent). Melting points were measured on a melting point apparatus. All physicochemical data reported for the Ni(II) complexes are due to the single diastereomer after purification by chromatography or crystallization.
General Procedure
General Procedure for the Synthesis of (Ra)(Sc)-23a
A suspension of (R)-17 (100 mg, 0.176 mmol, 1 equiv), rac-6-Cl-tryptophan 22a or (R)-6-Cl-tryptophan 22a (46 mg, 0.194 mmol, 1.1 equiv), Ni(OAc)2·4H2O (48 mg, 0.194 mmol, 1.1 equiv), and K2CO3 (146 mg, 1.06 mmol, 6 equiv) was refluxed in methanol (6 mL) at 70 °C for 2 h. After cooling, the mixture was diluted with icy 2.5% aqueous acetic acid (25 mL) and then extracted three times with dichloromethane. The combined organic layers were dried with Na2SO4 and concentrated in vacuo. The crude reaction mixture was subjected to column chromatography on silica gel. Eluent PE/EA = 4:1 was used to remove the residual ligand (R)-17 followed by using eluent DCM/MeOH = 20:1 to obtain the mixture of the two diastereomers (Ra)(Sc)-23a and (Ra)(Rc)-23a (144 mg, yield 97%) for analysis (dr = 99:1). The mixture was purified again by column chromatography on silica gel (DCM/MeOH = 80:1) to give the major pure diastereomer (Ra)(Sc)-23a as a red solid.
Large-Scale Preparation of (Sa)(Rc)-23w
A suspension of (R)-17 (10.0 g, 17.6 mmol, 1 equiv), rac-cyclohexylalanine 22w (3.3 g, 19.4 mmol, 1.1 equiv), Ni(OAc)2·4H2O (4.8 g, 19.4 mmol, 1.1 equiv), and K2CO3 (14.6 g, 106 mmol, 6 equiv) was refluxed in methanol (100 mL) at 70 °C for 12 h. After cooling, the mixture was concentrated in vacuo, and then the residue was dissolved in dichloromethane, diluted with icy 2.5% aqueous acetic acid (500 mL), and extracted three times with dichloromethane. The combined organic layers were dried with Na2SO4, concentrated in vacuo, and then purified by column chromatography on silica gel to give the crude products (Ra)(Sc)-23w and (Ra)(Rc)-23w (13.3 g, yield 97%) for analysis (dr >99:1). The crude products were purified again by recrystallization in ethanol to give the major pure diastereomer (Ra)(Sc)-23w as a red solid (12.9 g, yield 94%).
General Procedure for the Synthesis of (R)-22j
A suspension of (Sa)(Rc)-23j (500 mg, 0.621 mmol, 1 equiv) in methanol (15 mL) was added 6 N HCl, and the whole was heated at 40 °C for 6 h. The reaction mixture was concentrated to dryness upon disappearance of the red color of the starting complex. The residue was added ethyl acetate (20 mL) and water (5 mL), stirred, and separated. The organic phase was extracted sequentially with 1 N HCl (4 mL) and water (4 mL). The resulting organic phase was washed with saturated sodium hydrogen carbonate solution (5 mL), water (5 mL), and brine (5 mL), dried with Na2SO4, and concentrated to afford the recovered (S)-17 (341 mg, yield 97%). The combined aqueous phase was evaporated in vacuo to the residue, which was dissolved in methanol (4 mL) and separated by preparative performance liquid chromatography using an Agilent 1200 Series spectrometer with Eclipse XDB-C18 column (9.4 × 250 mm, 5 μm) (MeOH/H2O = 5/95, λ= 214 nm, 5.0 mL/min) to afford pure (R)-22j as a white solid (118 mg, yield 95%).
General Procedure for the Synthesis of (R)-22y
A suspension of (Sa)(Rc)-23y (500 mg, 0.621 mmol, 1 equiv) in methanol (15 mL) was added 6 N HCl, and the whole was heated at 40 °C for 8 h. The reaction mixture was concentrated to dryness upon disappearance of the red color of the starting complex. To the residue were added ethyl acetate (20 mL) and water (5 mL), and the mixture was stirred and separated. The organic phase was extracted sequentially with 1 N HCl (4 mL) and water (4 mL). The resulting organic phase was washed with saturated sodium hydrogen carbonate solution (5 mL), water (5 mL), and brine (5 mL), dried with Na2SO4, and concentrated to afford the recovered (S)-17 (373 mg, yield 97%). The combined aqueous phase was evaporated in vacuo to the residue, which was redissolved in a minimum amount deionized water and loaded on a Dowex 50 × 2 100 ion-exchange column. The column was washed with deionized water until neutral and then washed with 10% aq NH4OH. The first fraction (400 mL) was collected and evaporated under vacuum to afford (R)-22y as a white solid (82 mg, yield 93%).
General Procedure for the Synthesis of (R)-24y
N-[(Benzyloxy)carbonyl]oxysuccinimide (114 mg, 0.457 mmol, 1 equiv) was dissolved in 1 mL of acetone at 0 °C, which was added a solution of (R)-22y (60 mg, 0.457 mmol, 1 equiv), sodium hydrogen carbonate (77 mg, 0.914 mmol, 2 equiv), and sodium carbonate (49 mg, 0.457 mmol, 1 equiv) in water (3 mL) and acetone (1 mL). The whole was stirred at room temperature for 12 h and then concentrated to remove the acetone. The residual aqueous phase was acidified with 1 N HCl to pH 4, and then the white solid was precipitated out. The solid was collected by filtration to afford (R)-24y (109 mg, yield 90%, ee >99%).
Analytical Characterization Data of Products
Nickel(II)–(R)-17/(S)-6-chlorotryptophan Schiff base complex 23a:
red solid (144 mg, yield 97%); mp 277.8–279.6 °C; [α]25D = +2134 (c 0.058, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.25 (s, 1H), 8.52 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 8.23 (d, J = 9.3 Hz, 1H), 8.05 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.96 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.93 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.89 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.81 (d, J = 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.72 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.57 (m, 3H), 7.51–7.41 (m, 2H), 7.38 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.34–7.27 (m, 2H), 7.25–7.17 (m, 3H), 7.11 (dd, J = 8.6, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.03 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 6.94 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H), 6.77 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 4.46 (d, J = 12.1 Hz, 1H), 4.16 (dd, J = 5.5, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 3.47 (s, 1H), 3.32 (d, J = 14.3 Hz, 1H), 3.26 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1H), 2.83 (d, J = 14.0 Hz, 1H), 2.68 (dd, J = 14.5, 6.2 Hz, 1H), 2.50 (d, J = 15.3 Hz, 1H), 2.40 (d, J = 12.3 Hz, 1H), 1.49 (d, J = 14.4 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 176.8, 173.5, 168.4, 141.5, 137.3, 135.3, 134.0, 133.4, 133.4, 132.4, 131.5, 131.5, 131.3, 130.6, 130.4, 130.3, 129.4, 129.1, 128.7, 128.6, 128.6, 128.5, 128.5, 128.1, 128.1, 127.9, 127.4, 126.9, 126.7, 126.7, 126.5, 126.3, 126.3, 125.4, 124.0, 121.4, 119.4, 111.4, 108.9, 79.2, 71.0, 64.8, 60.3, 59.8, 55.7, 29.1, 20.8, 14.1; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C48H34Cl2N4NiO3Na+ [M + Na]+ 865.1254, found 865.1248. The dr was determined by LC/MS with an Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) (MeOH/H2O = 85/15, λ = 254 nm, 1.0 mL/min) tR (major diastereomer) = 15.530 min, tR (minor diastereomer) = 21.123 min, dr = 99:1.
Nickel(II)–(S)-17/(R)-2-bromophenylalanine Schiff base complex 23b:
red solid (142 mg, yield 95%); mp 233.5–235.1 °C; [α]25D = −2230 (c 0.044, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.59 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 8.45 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 8.22–8.03 (m, 2H), 8.01–7.87 (m, 3H), 7.68–7.40 (m, 10H), 7.40–7.16 (m, 6H), 6.75 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 4.57 (d, J = 12.4 Hz, 1H), 4.24 (t, J = 2.7 Hz, 1H), 3.85 (d, J = 15.4 Hz, 1H), 3.19 (dd, J = 14.0, 4.8 Hz, 2H), 3.07 (dd, J = 13.8, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 2.76 (d, J = 15.3 Hz, 1H), 2.69 (d, J = 13.9 Hz, 1H), 2.53 (d, J = 12.5 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 176.4, 173.4, 170.2, 141.1, 136.5, 135.5, 134.8, 133.7, 133.6, 133.2, 133.1, 132.3, 132.2, 132.1, 131.0, 130.7, 130.6, 129.9, 129.1, 128.9, 128.8, 128.8, 128.6, 128.2, 128.2, 128.1, 128.0, 128.0, 127.4, 127.0, 126.9, 126.5, 126.0, 126.0, 125.4, 124.7, 72.0, 65.6, 61.0, 57.2, 38.0; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C46H34BrClN3NiO3+ [M + H]+ 848.0820, found 848.0811. The dr was determined by LC/MS with an Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) (MeOH/H2O = 80/20, λ = 254 nm, 1.0 mL/min) tR (major diastereomer) = 33.869 min, tR (minor diastereomer) = 54.419 min, dr = 98:2.
Nickel(II)–(S)-17/(R)-2-methoxyphenylalanine Schiff base complex 23c:
red solid (99 mg, yield 70%); mp 211.1–212.0 °C; [α]25D = −1223 (c 0.056, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.71 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 8.32 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 8.10 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.99–7.89 (m, 3H), 7.79 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.59–7.44 (m, 6H), 7.40 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.36–7.29 (m, 3H), 7.29–7.18 (m, 5H), 7.09 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.66 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H), 4.52 (d, J = 12.2 Hz, 1H), 4.14–4.07 (m, 1H), 3.63 (d, J = 15.3 Hz, 1H), 3.37 (s, 3H), 3.21 (dd, J = 13.7, 6.1 Hz, 2H), 2.85 (d, J = 14.0 Hz, 1H), 2.66 (dd, J = 13.3, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 2.60 (d, J = 15.3 Hz, 1H), 2.38 (d, J = 12.2 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 177.8, 174.3, 170.3, 159.0, 141.1, 136.0, 135.2, 134.0, 133.7, 133.7, 133.1, 132.2, 132.2, 131.5, 131.2, 131.1, 130.2, 129.4, 129.4, 129.2, 129.1, 129.0, 128.9, 128.6, 128.5, 128.4, 127.9, 127.7, 127.4, 127.4, 127.1, 126.5, 126.4, 126.3, 125.8, 125.4, 125.1, 121.3, 110.3, 72.6, 65.9, 61.5, 57.6, 54.8, 33.2; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C47H36ClN3NiO4Na+ [M + Na]+: 822.1640, found 822.1630. The dr was determined by LC/MS with an Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) (MeOH/H2O = 80/20, λ = 254 nm, 1.0 mL/min) tR (major diastereomer) = 37.472 min, tR (minor diastereomer) = 65.897 min, dr = 96:4.
Nickel(II)–(S)-17/(R)-2-hydroxyphenylalanine Schiff base complex 23d:
red solid (136 mg, yield 98%); mp 246.2–247.9 °C; [α]25D = −2186 (c 0.050, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.56 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.11 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 8.09 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.95 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.92 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.66 (t, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.59–7.41 (m, 8H), 7.38–7.27 (m, 4H), 7.25–7.18 (m, 4H), 6.74 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 4.55 (d, J = 12.1 Hz, 1H), 4.19 (dd, J = 5.0, 2.7 Hz, 1H), 3.74 (d, J = 15.7 Hz, 1H), 3.17 (d, J = 14.0 Hz, 1H), 3.10 (dd, J = 13.5, 5.2 Hz, 1H), 2.87 (d, J = 14.1 Hz, 1H), 2.75–2.63 (m, 2H), 2.53 (d, J = 12.2 Hz, 1H), 1.99 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 176.1, 173.6, 169.0, 157.3, 141.6, 135.6, 135.5, 134.1, 134.1, 133.5, 132.7, 132.6, 132.5, 131.7, 131.6, 131.2, 131.1, 130.7, 130.5, 130.4, 130.1, 129.4, 129.1, 128.9, 128.8, 128.8, 128.6, 128.5, 128.4, 128.3, 127.9, 127.4, 126.7, 126.5, 126.3, 126.2, 125.4, 123.8, 122.7, 119.5, 115.3, 71.5, 65.3, 60.5, 56.4, 32.4; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C46H35ClN3NiO4+ [M + H]+ 786.1664, found 786.1667. The dr was determined by LC/MS with an Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) (MeOH/H2O = 80/20, λ = 254 nm, 1.0 mL/min) tR (major diastereomer) = 29.411 min, tR (minor diastereomer) = 51.382 min, dr = 97:3.
Nickel(II)–(S)-17/(R)-2-cyanophenylalanine Schiff base complex 23e:
red solid (108 mg, yield 77%); mp 240.8–242.0 °C; [α]25D = −1743 (c 0.044, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.58 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.50 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 8.13–8.07 (m, 2H), 7.94 (t, J = 8.2 Hz, 3H), 7.85 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.80 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 7.61–7.39 (m, 9H), 7.34–7.19 (m, 5H), 6.75 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 4.57 (d, J = 12.1 Hz, 1H), 4.29 (t, J = 4.1 Hz, 1H), 3.68 (d, J = 15.2 Hz, 1H), 3.19 (d, J = 14.0 Hz, 1H), 3.16–3.05 (m, 2H), 2.76 (d, J = 15.3 Hz, 1H), 2.65 (d, J = 13.9 Hz, 1H), 2.50 (d, J = 12.3 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 176.1, 173.3, 171.6, 141.1, 140.2, 135.5, 134.9, 133.6, 133.3, 133.2, 132.6, 132.3, 132.2, 131.0, 130.7, 130.5, 130.0, 129.2, 128.9, 128.7, 128.2, 128.1, 128.0, 127.9, 127.8, 127.7, 127.4, 127.0, 126.9, 126.7, 126.5, 126.1, 126.0, 126.0, 125.5, 124.4, 117.8, 114.9, 71.4, 65.5, 61.0, 57.5, 37.4; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C47H34ClN4NiO3+ [M + H]+ 795.1667, found 795.1686. The dr was determined by LC/MS with an Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) (MeOH/H2O = 80/20, λ = 254 nm, 1.0 mL/min) tR (major diastereomer) = 19.638 min, tR (minor diastereomer) = not found, dr >99:1.
Nickel(II)–(S)-17/(R)-3-bromophenylalanine Schiff base complex 23f:
red solid (145 mg, yield 97%); mp 236.5–238.4 °C; [α]25D = −2000 (c 0.048, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.65 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 8.36 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 8.10 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.02–7.88 (m, 4H), 7.79 (s, 1H), 7.64–7.44 (m, 7H), 7.41 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 7.34 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.30–7.20 (m, 4H), 7.18 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.08 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 6.69 (d, J = 1.7 Hz, 1H), 4.56 (d, J = 12.2 Hz, 1H), 4.22 (dd, J = 5.2, 2.7 Hz, 1H), 3.74 (d, J = 15.3 Hz, 1H), 3.31 (d, J = 14.0 Hz, 1H), 3.03 (d, J = 14.2 Hz, 1H), 2.99 (dd, J = 13.8, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 2.69 (d, J = 15.4 Hz, 1H), 2.53 (dd, J = 13.6, 5.7 Hz, 1H), 2.49 (d, J = 12.4 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 176.8, 173.7, 169.7, 141.0, 138.5, 135.7, 134.8, 133.7, 133.6, 133.2, 132.5, 132.3, 132.0, 131.1, 130.7, 130.7, 130.5, 130.1, 130.1, 129.9, 129.0, 129.0, 128.8, 128.7, 128.4, 128.1, 128.0, 127.6, 127.4, 127.1, 127.0, 126.9, 126.8, 126.6, 126.1, 126.0, 125.9, 125.9, 125.7, 124.7, 123.0, 71.1, 65.5, 61.2, 57.5, 38.0; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C46H34BrClN3NiO3+ [M + H]+: 848.0820, found 848.0819. The dr was determined by LC/MS with an Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) (MeOH/H2O = 80/20, λ = 254 nm, 1.0 mL/min) tR (major diastereomer) = 32.911 min, tR (minor diastereomer) = 58.600 min, dr = 94:6.
Nickel(II)–(S)-17/(R)-3-hydroxyphenylalanine Schiff base complex 23g:
red solid (136 mg, yield 98%); mp 242.1–243.0 °C; [α]25D = −2352 (c 0.048, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.78 (s, 1H), 9.23 (s, 1H), 8.37 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 8.18 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 8.11 (t, J = 9.7 Hz, 2H), 7.70–7.49 (m, 5H), 7.45–7.12 (m, 9H), 6.91 (s, 1H), 6.74 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 6.23 (s, 1H), 4.55 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 3.89 (d, J = 15.0 Hz, 1H), 3.83 (s, 1H), 3.17 (d, J = 13.3 Hz, 1H), 3.03 (d, J = 13.9 Hz, 1H), 2.71 (d, J = 13.3 Hz, 1H), 2.46–2.31 (m, 2H), 2.08 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 176.1, 174.2, 169.1, 158.4, 142.1, 137.8, 136.0, 134.5, 134.0, 133.9, 132.8, 132.0, 131.7, 131.2, 130.9, 130.8, 130.2, 129.9, 129.6, 129.3, 129.2, 129.1, 129.1, 128.8, 128.4, 128.3, 127.8, 127.2, 127.1, 126.9, 126.9, 126.8, 126.7, 125.9, 124.5, 122.5, 118.4, 115.3, 71.7, 65.9, 61.0, 56.8, 38.7; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C46H35ClN3NiO4+ [M + H]+: 786.1664, found 786.1666. The dr was determined by LC/MS with an Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) (MeOH/H2O = 85/15, λ = 254 nm, 1.0 mL/min) tR (major diastereomer) = 23.764 min, tR (minor diastereomer) = 32.856 min, dr = 94:6.
Nickel(II)–(S)-17/(R)-3-methoxyphenylalanine Schiff base complex 23h:
red solid (140 mg, yield 99%); mp 234.2–235.7 °C; [α]25D = −2142 (c 0.048, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.68 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.37 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 8.10 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.99–7.92 (m, 3H), 7.62–7.44 (m, 6H), 7.43–7.30 (m, 4H), 7.28–7.21 (m, 3H), 7.18 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.10–7.05 (m, 2H), 6.96 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.67 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 4.56 (d, J = 12.2 Hz, 1H), 4.21 (dd, J = 5.3, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 3.84 (s, 3H), 3.78 (d, J = 15.3 Hz, 1H), 3.25 (d, J = 13.9 Hz, 1H), 3.00 (dd, J = 13.4, 2.7 Hz, 1H), 2.90 (d, J = 13.8 Hz, 1H), 2.63 (d, J = 15.2 Hz, 1H), 2.56 (dd, J = 13.5, 5.4 Hz, 1H), 2.45 (d, J = 12.3 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 177.1, 173.8, 169.3, 159.9, 140.9, 137.5, 135.6, 134.8, 133.6, 133.2, 132.4, 132.3, 131.9, 131.0, 130.7, 130.6, 130.0, 129.5, 129.0, 128.9, 128.8, 128.6, 128.4, 128.2, 128.0, 127.8, 127.5, 127.1, 127.0, 126.9, 126.6, 126.1, 125.9, 125.9, 125.6, 124.8, 123.5, 115.6, 113.9, 71.5, 65.5, 61.1, 57.1, 55.0, 38.6; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C47H37ClN3NiO4+ [M + H]+ 800.1821, found 800.1827. The dr was determined by LC/MS with an Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) (MeOH/H2O = 85/15, λ = 254 nm, 1.0 mL/min) tR (major diastereomer) = 30.174 min, tR (minor diastereomer) = 48.851 min, dr = 91:9.
Nickel(II)–(S)-17/(R)-4-bromophenylalanine Schiff base complex 23i:
red solid (148 mg, yield 99%); mp 250.0–250.9 °C; [α]25D = −1896 (c 0.056, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.66 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.40 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 8.09 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.00 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.94 (t, J = 9.4 Hz, 2H), 7.83 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.66–7.27 (m, 11H), 7.26–7.12 (m, 3H), 7.05 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 6.68 (d, J = 2.6 Hz, 1H), 4.62 (d, J = 12.2 Hz, 1H), 4.20 (t, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 3.76 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 3.19 (d, J = 13.8 Hz, 1H), 2.92 (dd, J = 13.5, 3.3 Hz, 1H), 2.73 (dd, J = 14.7, 9.0 Hz, 2H), 2.55 (dd, J = 13.6, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 2.47 (d, J = 12.1 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 176.6, 173.9, 169.8, 140.9, 135.6, 134.8, 134.7, 133.5, 133.2, 132.9, 132.3, 131.9, 131.5, 130.9, 130.6, 130.4, 130.0, 129.0, 128.7, 128.1, 128.0, 127.7, 127.3, 127.0, 127.0, 126.9, 126.5, 126.0, 125.9, 125.8, 125.7, 124.8, 121.5, 71.3, 65.5, 61.2, 57.5, 38.1; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C46H33BrClN3NiO3Na+ [M + Na]+ 870.0640, found 870.0635. The dr was determined by LC/MS with an Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) (MeOH/H2O = 80/20, λ = 254 nm, 1.0 mL/min) tR (major diastereomer) = 46.207 min, tR (minor diastereomer) = not found, dr >99:1.
Nickel(II)–(S)-17/(R)-4-chlorophenylalanine Schiff base complex 23j:
red solid (702 mg, yield 99%); mp 256.5–257.9 °C; [α]25D = −2067 (c 0.052, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.69 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 8.39 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 8.09 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.00 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.95 (t, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.68 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.63–7.30 (m, 11H), 7.25–7.19 (m, 2H), 7.14 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.05 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 6.66 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 4.61 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 4.20 (t, J = 3.2 Hz, 1H), 3.75 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 3.19 (d, J = 13.7 Hz, 1H), 2.95 (dd, J = 13.4, 2.7 Hz, 1H), 2.71 (dd, J = 14.6, 4.6 Hz, 2H), 2.57 (dd, J = 13.2, 4.7 Hz, 1H), 2.45 (d, J = 12.4 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 177.0, 174.4, 170.2, 141.4, 136.1, 135.2, 134.9, 134.0, 133.9, 133.7, 133.0, 132.8, 132.4, 131.5, 131.1, 130.9, 130.5, 129.5, 129.5, 129.3, 129.1, 128.6, 128.5, 128.5, 128.2, 127.8, 127.5, 127.4, 127.0, 126.5, 126.4, 126.3, 126.2, 125.3, 71.9, 66.0, 61.7, 58.0, 38.5; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C46H34Cl2N3NiO3+ [M + H]+ 804.1325, found 804.1303. The dr was determined by LC/MS with an Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) (MeOH/H2O = 85/15, λ = 254 nm, 1.0 mL/min) tR (major diastereomer) = 17.230 min, tR (minor diastereomer) = 20.807 min, dr = 99:1.
Nickel(II)–(S)-17/(R)-4-fluorophenylalanine Schiff base complex 23k:
red solid (138 mg, yield 99%); mp 210.5–212.0 °C; [α]25D = −2385 (c 0.052, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.65 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.38 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 8.09 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.03–7.87 (m, 3H), 7.66–7.26 (m, 14H), 7.24–7.15 (m, 2H), 7.05 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 6.68 (s, 1H), 4.60 (d, J = 12.2 Hz, 1H), 4.20 (t, J = 3.9 Hz, 1H), 3.75 (d, J = 15.5 Hz, 1H), 3.22 (d, J = 13.9 Hz, 1H), 2.96 (d, J = 13.0 Hz, 1H), 2.73 (t, J = 14.5 Hz, 2H), 2.58 (dd, J = 14.0, 4.6 Hz, 1H), 2.48 (d, J = 12.3 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 176.7, 173.8, 169.7, 162.4 (d, J = 246.0 Hz), 140.8, 135.6, 134.7, 133.5, 133.2, 132.6 (d, J = 7.0 Hz), 132.3, 131.9, 131.6, 131.0, 130.6, 130.4, 130.0, 129.0, 128.8, 128.8, 128.1, 128.0, 127.8, 127.3, 126.9, 126.9, 126.7, 126.6, 126.0, 125.9, 125.7, 124.7, 115.3 (d, J = 21.2 Hz), 71.5, 65.6, 61.2, 57.5, 37.9; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C46H33ClFN3NiO3Na+ [M + Na]+ 810.1440, found 810.1429. The dr was determined by LC/MS with an Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) (MeOH/H2O = 85/15, λ = 254 nm, 1.0 mL/min) tR (major diastereomer) = 23.932 min, tR (minor diastereomer) = 40.639 min, dr = 99:1.
Nickel(II)–(S)-17/(R)-4-trifluoromethylphenylalanine Schiff base complex 23l:
red solid (136 mg, yield 92%); mp 242.0–243.9 °C; [α]25D = −2121 (c 0.072, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.66 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.41 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 8.10 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.00–7.91 (m, 5H), 7.65–7.53 (m, 5H), 7.52–7.44 (m, 2H), 7.39 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.35–7.19 (m, 6H), 7.08 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 6.71 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 4.59 (d, J = 12.2 Hz, 1H), 4.27–4.24 (m, 1H), 3.56 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 3.20 (d, J = 14.3 Hz, 1H), 3.02 (dd, J = 13.4, 3.4 Hz, 1H), 2.72 (d, J = 15.5 Hz, 1H), 2.65 (dd, J = 13.5, 5.0 Hz, 1H), 2.58 (d, J = 14.0 Hz, 1H), 2.48 (d, J = 12.2 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 176.9, 174.2, 170.5, 141.5, 140.6, 136.1, 135.2, 134.0, 133.7, 133.0, 132.8, 132.5, 131.9, 131.4, 131.1, 130.8, 130.6, 130.3 (q, J = 32.4 Hz), 129.5, 129.3, 129.3, 128.6, 128.5, 128.4, 128.1, 127.8, 127.5, 127.4, 127.3, 127.1, 126.9, 126.5, 126.4, 126.4, 126.3, 126.2, 125.7 (q, J = 3.3 Hz), 125.2, 124.5 (q, J = 272.1 Hz), 71.6, 65.7, 61.5, 58.0, 38.8; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C47H34ClF3N3NiO3+ [M + H]+: 838.1589, found 838.1569. The dr was determined by LC/MS with an Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) (MeOH/H2O = 80/20, λ = 254 nm, 1.0 mL/min) tR (major diastereomer) = 37.403 min, tR (minor diastereomer) = 63.798 min, dr = 94:6.
Nickel(II)–(S)-17/(R)-4-acetylphenylalanine Schiff base complex 23m:
red solid (112 mg, yield 78%); mp 236.8–238.7 °C; [α]25D = −2145 (c 0.040, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.57 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.34 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 8.26 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 8.08 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 7.99 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.94 (dd, J = 11.1, 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.65–7.53 (m, 5H), 7.48 (q, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.40 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.35–7.18 (m, 6H), 7.10 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 1H), 6.73 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 4.57 (d, J = 12.1 Hz, 1H), 4.27–4.23 (m, 1H), 3.47 (d, J = 15.7 Hz, 1H), 3.18 (d, J = 13.8 Hz, 1H), 3.06 (dd, J = 13.2, 3.1 Hz, 1H), 2.79 (s, 3H), 2.73–2.60 (m, 3H), 2.48 (d, J = 12.3 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 198.1, 176.7, 173.8, 169.9, 141.5, 140.9, 136.9, 135.7, 134.6, 133.5, 133.2, 132.4, 132.3, 132.0, 131.3, 131.0, 130.6, 130.4, 130.1, 129.1, 129.0, 128.8, 128.3, 128.1, 128.1, 128.0, 127.7, 127.4, 127.0, 127.0, 126.8, 126.7, 126.6, 126.1, 126.0, 125.9, 125.9, 125.8, 124.8, 71.2, 65.2, 61.2, 57.5, 38.5, 26.6; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C48H37ClN3NiO4+ [M + H]+: 812.1821, found 812.1821. The dr was determined by LC/MS with an Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) (MeOH/H2O = 85/15, λ = 254 nm, 1.0 mL/min). tR (major diastereomer) = 23.559 min, tR (minor diastereomer) = 37.073 min, dr = 93:7.
Nickel(II)–(S)-17/(R)-3-(2-Naphthyl)alanine Schiff Base Complex 23n
red solid (142 mg, yield 98%). mp 242.4–243.8 °C. [α]25D = −2443 (c 0.044, CHCl3). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.50 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 8.32 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 8.25 (dd, J = 7.6, 4.4 Hz, 2H), 8.10 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 8.03 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.92 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.89 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.69–7.32 (m, 11H), 7.29–7.17 (m, 5H), 7.11 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.74 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H), 4.38 (d, J = 12.1 Hz, 1H), 4.36–4.32 (m, 1H), 3.74–3.65 (m, 1H), 3.06 (dd, J = 14.1, 5.7 Hz, 1H), 2.99 (d, J = 15.4 Hz, 1H), 2.70 (d, J = 14.0 Hz, 1H), 2.29 (t, J = 13.5 Hz, 2H), 1.53 (d, J = 14.1 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 177.9, 174.0, 169.4, 141.4, 135.8, 135.1, 134.4, 134.0, 134.0, 133.5, 133.1, 132.7, 132.7, 132.4, 131.4, 131.1, 130.8, 130.5, 130.5, 129.5, 129.4, 129.2, 128.9, 128.7, 128.6, 128.4, 128.0, 127.8, 127.4, 127.4, 127.2, 127.0, 126.9, 126.9, 126.4, 126.3, 126.2, 126.0, 125.2, 72.0, 65.5, 61.3, 56.7, 35.6; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C50H37ClN3NiO3+ [M + H]+: 820.1871, found 820.1872. The dr was determined by LC/MS with an Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) (MeOH/H2O = 80/20, λ = 254 nm, 1.0 mL/min) tR (major diastereomer) = 38.932 min, tR (minor diastereomer) = not found, dr >99:1.
Nickel(II)–(S)-17/(R)-1,1′-biphenylglycine Schiff base complex 23o:
red solid (144 mg, yield 98%); mp 258.0–258.8 °C; [α]25D = −1479 (c 0.048, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.80 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 8.49 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 8.18 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 8.04–7.92 (m, 3H), 7.73 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.61–7.19 (m, 18H), 7.06 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.71 (s, 1H), 6.13 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 4.92 (d, J = 12.2 Hz, 1H), 4.79 (s, 1H), 4.67 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 3.81 (d, J = 14.0 Hz, 1H), 3.71 (d, J = 14.1 Hz, 1H), 3.18 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 2.79 (d, J = 12.2 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 176.7, 174.4, 171.7, 140.8, 140.6, 139.9, 136.3, 135.7, 135.1, 133.7, 133.3, 132.7, 132.5, 132.1, 131.1, 130.8, 130.6, 129.5, 129.1, 128.8, 128.4, 128.3, 128.3, 128.0, 127.6, 127.5, 127.1, 127.1, 127.1, 127.0, 126.9, 126.7, 126.6, 126.2, 126.0, 125.9, 125.7, 124.8, 74.3, 65.9, 61.6, 58.5; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C51H37ClN3NiO3+ [M + H]+ 832.1871, found 832.1881. The dr was determined by LC/MS with an Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) (MeOH/H2O = 80/20, λ = 254 nm, 1.0 mL/min) tR (major diastereomer) = 24.023 min, tR (minor diastereomer) = 40.287 min, dr = 97:3.
Nickel(II)–(S)-17/(R)-3-(2-quinolyl)alanine Schiff base complex 23p:
red solid (133 mg, yield 92%); mp 247.8–249.2 °C; [α]25D = −1425 (c 0.072, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.60 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.37 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 8.32 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.21 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 8.13 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 8.06 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.98–7.75 (m, 5H), 7.65–7.27 (m, 9H), 7.26–7.07 (m, 4H), 6.84 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 1H), 6.70 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 4.51 (d, J = 12.3 Hz, 1H), 4.30 (dd, J = 5.4, 3.6 Hz, 1H), 3.26 (dd, J = 12.9, 3.6 Hz, 1H), 3.02 (d, J = 13.7 Hz, 2H), 2.47–2.14 (m, 3H), 2.09 (d, J = 14.2 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 177.6, 174.1, 170.5, 157.7, 141.3, 136.5, 135.8, 135.2, 133.9, 133.5, 133.2, 132.5, 132.4, 131.3, 131.0, 130.9, 130.4, 130.3, 130.2, 129.4, 129.2, 128.9, 128.5, 128.3, 128.3, 128.0, 127.9, 127.5, 127.4, 127.4, 127.2, 126.9, 126.4, 126.3, 126.2, 125.9, 125.1, 123.9, 71.2, 65.2, 61.5, 57.4, 41.6; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C49H36ClN4NiO3+ [M + H]+ 821.1824, found 821.1829. The dr was determined by LC/MS with an Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) (MeOH/H2O = 80/20, λ = 254 nm, 1.0 mL/min) tR (major diastereomer) = 110.603 min, tR (minor diastereomer) = not found, dr >99:1.
Nickel(II)–(R)-17/(S)-3-(3-benzothienyl)alanine Schiff base complex 23q:
red solid (141 mg, yield 97%); mp 238.5–241.0 °C; [α]25D = +2015 (c 0.046, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.60 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.36 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 8.30 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 8.05 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.94–7.89 (m, 3H), 7.86 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.65–7.26 (m, 10H), 7.24–7.05 (m, 6H), 6.70 (d, J = 2.6 Hz, 1H), 4.46 (d, J = 12.3 Hz, 1H), 4.23 (dd, J = 5.5, 2.9 Hz, 1H), 3.38 (dd, J = 14.1, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 3.23 (d, J = 15.3 Hz, 1H), 2.87 (dd, J = 14.2, 6.0 Hz, 2H), 2.39 (d, J = 15.2 Hz, 1H), 2.31 (d, J = 12.3 Hz, 1H), 1.76 (d, J = 14.0 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 177.6, 173.8, 169.2, 141.0, 140.1, 139.8, 135.4, 134.6, 133.5, 133.0, 132.3, 132.3, 131.9, 130.9, 130.6, 130.4, 130.0, 129.0, 128.7, 128.4, 128.2, 128.1, 127.9, 127.5, 127.3, 126.9, 126.8, 126.6, 126.4, 125.9, 125.8, 125.5, 124.9, 124.8, 124.7, 123.1, 122.2, 70.8, 65.1, 61.0, 56.4, 31.8; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C48H35ClN3NiO3S+ [M + H]+ 826.1436, found 826.1443. The dr was determined by LC/MS with an Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) (MeOH/H2O = 80/20, λ = 254 nm, 1.0 mL/min) tR (major diastereomer) = 36.297 min, tR (minor diastereomer) = not found, dr >99:1.
Nickel(II)–(R)-17/(S)-3-(3-thienyl)alanine Schiff base complex 23r:
red solid (133 mg, yield 97%); mp 255.6–255.9 °C; [α]25D = +2125 (c 0.052, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.69 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 8.38 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 8.11 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.96 (q, J = 7.4, 6.8 Hz, 3H), 7.75–7.70 (m, 1H), 7.62–7.39 (m, 9H), 7.33 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.26–7.16 (m, 4H), 7.03 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H), 6.68 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 4.61 (d, J = 12.2 Hz, 1H), 4.25–4.13 (m, 1H), 4.05 (d, J = 15.2 Hz, 1H), 3.32 (d, J = 13.9 Hz, 1H), 3.21–2.93 (m, 2H), 2.74 (d, J = 15.3 Hz, 1H), 2.63 (dd, J = 13.9, 5.0 Hz, 1H), 2.50 (d, J = 12.3 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 177.7, 174.4, 170.1, 141.3, 136.5, 136.1, 135.3, 134.0, 133.7, 132.9, 132.7, 132.4, 131.5, 131.2, 131.2, 131.0, 130.5, 129.4, 129.4, 129.3, 129.0, 128.8, 128.6, 128.4, 128.3, 127.8, 127.5, 127.4, 127.3, 127.0, 126.5, 126.4, 126.1, 125.4, 125.2, 125.1, 71.7, 66.0, 61.6, 57.8, 33.6; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C44H33ClN3NiO3S+ [M + H]+ 776.1279, found 776.1284. The dr was determined by LC/MS with an Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) (MeOH/H2O = 85/15, λ = 254 nm, 1.0 mL/min) tR (major diastereomer) = 28.499 min, tR (minor diastereomer) = not found, dr >99:1.
Nickel(II)–(R)-17/(S)-3-(2-pyridyl)alanine Schiff base complex 23s:
red solid (84 mg, yield 62%); mp 239.7–242.3 °C; [α]25D = +1846 (c 0.048, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.89 (d, J = 4.1 Hz, 1H), 8.75 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.32 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 8.12 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.00–7.92 (m, 4H), 7.64–7.46 (m, 7H), 7.41 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.36 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.34–7.31 (m, 2H), 7.28–7.20 (m, 3H), 7.10 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 6.64 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 4.61 (d, J = 12.2 Hz, 1H), 4.26–4.22 (m, 1H), 3.74 (d, J = 15.3 Hz, 1H), 3.37 (d, J = 13.9 Hz, 1H), 3.11 (dd, J = 13.3, 2.6 Hz, 1H), 2.91 (d, J = 14.1 Hz, 1H), 2.87 (dd, J = 13.6, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 2.72 (d, J = 15.3 Hz, 1H), 2.45 (d, J = 12.2 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 177.5, 173.4, 170.0, 157.0, 149.6, 140.6, 136.2, 135.6, 134.8, 133.6, 133.3, 132.7, 132.0, 132.0, 131.1, 130.7, 130.6, 129.8, 128.9, 128.8, 128.6, 128.5, 128.2, 128.0, 128.0, 127.8, 127.6, 127.0, 126.9, 126.7, 126.3, 126.1, 126.0, 125.6, 125.1, 124.7, 122.0, 70.6, 65.5, 61.1, 57.8, 40.2; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C45H34ClN4NiO3+ [M + H]+ 771.1667, found 771.1662. The dr was determined by LC/MS with an Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) (MeOH/H2O = 85/15, λ = 254 nm, 1.0 mL/min) tR (major diastereomer) = 20.853 min, tR (minor diastereomer) = 38.453 min, dr = 99:1.
Nickel(II)–(R)-17/(S)-allylglycine Schiff base complex 23t:
red solid (125 mg, yield 98%); mp 234.9–235.2 °C; [α]25D = +2579 (c 0.056, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.73 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.41 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 8.15 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.99 (dd, J = 14.1, 8.2 Hz, 3H), 7.63–7.45 (m, 7H), 7.37 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.29 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 2H), 7.21 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 6.94 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H), 6.78 (dt, J = 17.3, 8.6 Hz, 1H), 6.68 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 5.76 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 5.37 (d, J = 17.1 Hz, 1H), 5.30 (s, 1H), 4.78 (d, J = 12.2 Hz, 1H), 4.52 (d, J = 15.2 Hz, 1H), 3.96 (dd, J = 5.5, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 3.70 (d, J = 13.8 Hz, 1H), 3.61 (d, J = 13.9 Hz, 1H), 3.06 (d, J = 15.4 Hz, 1H), 2.71 (d, J = 12.1 Hz, 1H), 2.48 (d, J = 14.6 Hz, 1H), 2.25 (dt, J = 13.8, 7.0 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 177.6, 174.4, 170.0, 141.1, 136.0, 135.5, 134.1, 133.7, 132.8, 132.6, 132.6, 132.4, 131.5, 131.3, 131.0, 130.3, 129.5, 129.3, 129.3, 129.2, 128.7, 128.5, 128.4, 127.9, 127.5, 127.5, 127.4, 127.3, 127.0, 126.5, 126.5, 126.5, 126.4, 126.2, 125.1, 120.5, 70.8, 66.6, 61.6, 59.2, 38.2; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C42H33ClN3NiO3+ [M + H]+ 720.1558, found 720.1570. The dr was determined by LC/MS with an Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) (MeOH/H2O = 85/15, λ = 254 nm, 1.0 mL/min) tR (major diastereomer) = 22.352 min, tR (minor diastereomer) = 31.724 min, dr = 97:3.
Nickel(II)–(R)-17/(S)-3-methyl-2-butenylglycine Schiff base complex 23u:
red solid (134 mg, yield 98%); mp 224.0–225.5 °C; [α]25D = +1943 (c 0.054, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.72 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.43 (d, J = 9.3 Hz, 1H), 8.14 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 8.02–7.93 (m, 3H), 7.57–7.44 (m, 7H), 7.36 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 7.31–7.23 (m, 2H), 7.20 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H), 6.96 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 6.68 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 1H), 6.29 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 4.78 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 4.49 (d, J = 15.4 Hz, 1H), 3.98 (t, J = 4.1 Hz, 1H), 3.72 (d, J = 13.5 Hz, 1H), 3.58 (d, J = 13.8 Hz, 1H), 3.04 (d, J = 15.5 Hz, 1H), 2.70 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 2.51–2.39 (m, 1H), 2.26 (s, 3H), 2.24–2.19 (m, 1H), 1.65 (s, 4H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 177.6, 173.9, 169.1, 140.7, 137.0, 135.6, 135.0, 133.6, 133.3, 132.1, 132.0, 131.1, 130.8, 130.6, 129.8, 129.0, 128.8, 128.8, 128.7, 128.2, 128.2, 128.1, 128.0, 127.6, 127.1, 127.0, 127.0, 126.8, 126.7, 126.1, 126.0, 125.7, 124.6, 118.1, 70.8, 66.1, 61.3, 58.7, 32.3, 26.8, 17.8; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C44H37ClN3NiO3+ [M + H]+ 748.1871, found 748.1884. The dr was determined by LC/MS with an Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) (MeOH/H2O = 85/15, λ = 254 nm, 1.0 mL/min) tR (major diastereomer) = 32.454 min, tR (minor diastereomer) = 51.081 min, dr = 93:7.
Nickel(II)–(S)-17/(R)-3-cyclopropylalanine Schiff base complex 23v:
red solid (128 mg, yield 99%); mp 240.1–242.0 °C; [α]25D = −1993 (c 0.056, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.85 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.43 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 8.18 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 8.03–7.93 (m, 3H), 7.59–7.35 (m, 9H), 7.31–7.21 (m, 2H), 7.06 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.92 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 6.60 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 4.76 (d, J = 12.1 Hz, 1H), 4.55 (d, J = 15.4 Hz, 1H), 3.79–3.63 (m, 3H), 3.04 (d, J = 15.5 Hz, 1H), 2.98–2.82 (m, 1H), 2.76–2.58 (m, 3H), 2.37 (p, J = 9.8 Hz, 1H), 1.96–1.71 (m, 3H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 176.1, 174.0, 168.7, 140.4, 135.6, 135.0, 133.7, 133.3, 132.1, 131.1, 130.8, 130.5, 129.8, 129.1, 128.7, 128.7, 128.6, 128.3, 128.2, 128.2, 128.0, 127.6, 127.6, 127.0, 126.9, 126.8, 126.1, 126.0, 126.0, 125.7, 124.6, 73.6, 66.3, 61.1, 58.8, 40.0, 25.2, 17.6; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C43H35ClN3NiO3+ [M + H]+ 734.1715, found 734.1718. The dr was determined by LC/MS with an Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) (MeOH/H2O = 80/20, λ = 254 nm, 1.0 mL/min) tR (major diastereomer) = 27.758 min, tR (minor diastereomer) = 40.486 min, dr = 98:2.
Nickel(II)–(S)-17/(R)-3-cyclohexylalanine Schiff base complex 23w:
red solid (13.3 g, yield 97%); mp 238.1–240.0 °C; [α]25D = −1893 (c 0.056, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.74 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 8.42 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 8.15 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.99 (t, J = 9.2 Hz, 3H), 7.59–7.43 (m, 8H), 7.43–7.27 (m, 3H), 7.20 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 6.92 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H), 6.66 (s, 1H), 4.82 (d, J = 11.9 Hz, 1H), 4.54 (d, J = 15.5 Hz, 1H), 3.86 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 3.79–3.58 (m, 2H), 3.07 (d, J = 15.5 Hz, 1H), 2.73 (d, J = 12.2 Hz, 1H), 2.09 (t, J = 11.3 Hz, 1H), 1.98–1.62 (m, 4H), 1.49–0.74 (m, 7H), 0.37 (q, J = 12.3 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 178.6, 174.5, 169.3, 140.9, 136.0, 135.5, 134.1, 133.7, 132.7, 132.5, 132.4, 131.5, 131.2, 131.0, 130.2, 129.4, 129.2, 129.1, 129.1, 128.7, 128.7, 128.5, 128.4, 128.0, 127.9, 127.7, 127.5, 127.4, 127.4, 127.3, 127.2, 126.4, 126.1, 125.1, 69.1, 66.5, 61.7, 58.9, 43.5, 34.6, 33.7, 32.1, 26.3, 26.3, 26.0; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C46H41ClN3NiO3+ [M + H]+ 776.2184, found 776.2190. The dr was determined by LC/MS with an Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) (MeOH/H2O = 80/20, λ = 254 nm, 1.0 mL/min) tR (major diastereomer) = 55.558 min, tR (minor diastereomer) = not found, dr >99:1.
Nickel(II)–(S)-17/(R)-n-propylglycine Schiff base complex 23x:
red solid (126 mg, yield 99%); mp 236.3–237.8 °C; [α]25D = −2111 (c 0.044, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.89 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.43 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 8.17 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.02–7.94 (m, 3H), 7.56 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.53–7.35 (m, 7H), 7.30–7.20 (m, 3H), 7.04 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.90 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 6.59 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 4.78 (d, J = 12.2 Hz, 1H), 4.55 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 3.89–3.83 (m, 1H), 3.75 (d, J = 13.9 Hz, 1H), 3.65 (d, J = 14.1 Hz, 1H), 3.05 (d, J = 15.5 Hz, 1H), 2.62 (d, J = 12.2 Hz, 1H), 2.52–2.41 (m, 1H), 1.92–1.74 (m, 1H), 1.62–1.53 (m, 1H), 0.89 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 178.0, 174.1, 169.2, 140.5, 135.6, 135.0, 133.7, 133.3, 132.3, 132.1, 132.0, 131.1, 130.8, 130.6, 129.8, 129.0, 128.8, 128.7, 128.7, 128.3, 128.2, 128.0, 127.6, 127.1, 127.0, 126.9, 126.6, 126.1, 126.0, 126.0, 125.8, 124.7, 70.3, 66.1, 61.3, 58.6, 36.5, 18.1, 13.6; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C42H35ClN3NiO3+ [M + H]+ 722.1715, found 722.1719. The dr was determined by LC/MS with an Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) (MeOH/H2O = 85/15, λ = 254 nm, 1.0 mL/min) tR (major diastereomer) = 26.690 min, tR (minor diastereomer) = 40.220 min, dr = 94:6.
Nickel(II)–(S)-17/(R)-n-butylglycine Schiff base complex 23y:
red solid (642 mg, yield 99%); mp 246.9–248.8 °C; [α]25D = −2157 (c 0.054, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.74 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.42 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 8.16 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 8.00 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 7.98 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.57–7.45 (m, 7H), 7.37 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.30–7.24 (m, 3H), 7.22–7.18 (m, 1H), 6.92 (dt, J = 7.5, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 6.67 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 4.81 (d, J = 12.2 Hz, 1H), 4.54 (d, J = 15.5 Hz, 1H), 3.89–3.84 (m, 1H), 3.75 (d, J = 13.9 Hz, 1H), 3.64 (d, J = 13.9 Hz, 1H), 3.09 (d, J = 15.4 Hz, 1H), 2.73 (d, J = 12.2 Hz, 1H), 2.57–2.45 (m, 1H), 1.87–1.75 (m, 2H), 1.32 (dt, J = 14.8, 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.28–1.22 (m, 1H), 0.94 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 178.0, 174.0, 169.3, 140.4, 135.6, 135.0, 133.7, 133.3, 132.3, 132.1, 132.0, 131.1, 130.8, 130.6, 129.8, 129.0, 128.8, 128.7, 128.7, 128.3, 128.2, 128.1, 128.0, 127.6, 127.1, 127.0, 126.9, 126.5, 126.1, 126.0, 126.0, 125.8, 124.7, 70.5, 66.2, 61.3, 58.7, 34.1, 27.0, 22.1, 13.6; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C43H36ClN3NiO3Na+ [M + Na]+ 758.1691, found 758.1685. The dr was determined by LC/MS with an Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) (MeOH/H2O = 85/15, λ = 254 nm, 1.0 mL/min) tR (major diastereomer) = 33.298 min, tR (minor diastereomer) = 53.250 min, dr = 93:7.
Nickel(II)–(R)-17/(S)-n-hexylglycine Schiff base complex 23z:
red solid (130 mg, yield 97%); mp 208.8–210.9 °C; [α]25D = +2056 (c 0.042, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.77 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.42 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 8.16 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.05–7.93 (m, 3H), 7.56–7.44 (m, 7H), 7.37 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.30–7.24 (m, 3H), 7.18–7.13 (m, 1H), 6.91 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 6.65 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 4.80 (d, J = 12.2 Hz, 1H), 4.53 (d, J = 15.5 Hz, 1H), 3.86 (dd, J = 6.5, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 3.75 (d, J = 13.9 Hz, 1H), 3.64 (d, J = 13.9 Hz, 1H), 3.08 (d, J = 15.4 Hz, 1H), 2.70 (d, J = 12.3 Hz, 1H), 2.58–2.49 (m, 1H), 1.90–1.75 (m, 2H), 1.65–1.58 (m, 2H), 1.34–1.29 (m, 5H), 0.90 (t, J = 5.8 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 178.4, 174.5, 169.6, 140.9, 136.1, 135.4, 134.1, 133.8, 132.8, 132.6, 132.4, 131.6, 131.2, 131.0, 130.2, 129.5, 129.2, 129.2, 129.1, 128.8, 128.6, 128.5, 128.5, 128.1, 127.5, 127.4, 127.3, 127.0, 126.6, 126.5, 126.4, 126.2, 125.1, 70.9, 66.6, 61.7, 59.2, 34.9, 31.8, 29.1, 25.4, 22.6, 14.1; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C45H41ClN3NiO3+ [M + H]+ 764.2184, found 764.2180. The dr was determined by LC/MS with an Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) (MeOH/H2O = 85/15, λ = 254 nm, 1.0 mL/min) tR (major diastereomer) = 61.085 min, tR (minor diastereomer) = 111.063 min, dr = 92:8.
Nickel(II)–(R)-17/(S)-4-chlorohomophenylalanine Schiff base complex 23aa:
red solid (143 mg, yield 99%); mp 230.1–241.0 °C; [α]25D = +2394 (c 0.032, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.72 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 8.44 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 8.16 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.02–7.98 (m, 2H), 7.97 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, 1H), 7.55–7.45 (m, 5H), 7.44–7.34 (m, 3H), 7.32–7.23 (m, 3H), 7.19–7.09 (m, 3H), 6.97 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 6.86 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.64 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, 1H), 4.85 (d, J = 12.2 Hz, 1H), 4.51 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 3.79 (dd, J = 9.1, 3.1 Hz, 1H), 3.74 (d, J = 13.7 Hz, 1H), 3.62 (d, J = 13.9 Hz, 1H), 3.20 (ddd, J = 13.6, 9.1, 4.2 Hz, 1H), 3.07 (d, J = 15.5 Hz, 1H), 2.86–2.78 (m, 1H), 2.75 (d, J = 12.3 Hz, 1H), 2.37 (dtd, J = 13.7, 9.2, 4.7 Hz, 1H), 1.81–1.71 (m, 1H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 177.6, 174.3, 169.7, 140.6, 138.3, 135.6, 135.1, 133.6, 133.3, 132.3, 132.1, 132.0, 131.4, 131.1, 130.8, 130.6, 129.8, 129.5, 129.0, 128.8, 128.7, 128.3, 128.2, 128.1, 128.0, 127.8, 127.5, 127.0, 127.0, 126.8, 126.7, 126.4, 126.1, 126.0, 126.0, 125.8, 124.7, 69.1, 65.9, 61.5, 58.4, 36.4, 30.3; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C47H36Cl2N3NiO3+ [M + H]+ 818.1482, found 818.1480. The dr was determined by LC/MS with an Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) (MeOH/H2O = 85/15, λ = 254 nm, 1.0 mL/min) tR (major diastereomer) = 65.602 min, tR (minor diastereomer) = 104.797 min, dr = 96:4.
Nickel(II)–(S)-17/(R)-c-butylglycine Schiff base complex 23bb:
red solid (625 mg, yield 96%); mp 242.4–244.2 °C; [α]25D = −2298 (c 0.046, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.73 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 8.42 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 8.17 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 8.08–7.92 (m, 3H), 7.57 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.54–7.44 (m, 6H), 7.36 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 7.31–7.23 (m, 3H), 7.19 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 6.94 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 6.66 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H), 4.77 (d, J = 12.1 Hz, 1H), 4.55 (d, J = 15.5 Hz, 1H), 3.77 (d, J = 4.4 Hz, 1H), 3.76–3.64 (m, 2H), 3.07 (d, J = 15.3 Hz, 1H), 2.90 (p, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 2.77–2.57 (m, 3H), 2.36 (p, J = 9.9 Hz, 1H), 1.96–1.69 (m, 3H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 176.2, 174.0, 168.7, 140.5, 135.6, 135.0, 133.7, 133.3, 132.1, 131.1, 130.8, 130.6, 129.8, 129.1, 128.7, 128.7, 128.6, 128.4, 128.2, 128.2, 128.0, 127.7, 127.6, 127.0, 126.8, 126.1, 126.0, 126.0, 125.8, 124.6, 73.6, 66.3, 61.1, 58.8, 40.1, 25.2, 25.2, 17.6; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C43H35ClN3NiO3+ [M + H]+ 734.1715, found 734.1725. The dr was determined by LC/MS with an Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) (MeOH/H2O = 80/20, λ = 254 nm, 1.0 mL/min) tR (major diastereomer) = 107.052 min, tR (minor diastereomer) = 168.542 min, dr = 96:4.
Nickel(II)–(R)-17/(S)-tert-butylglycine Schiff base complex 23cc:
red solid (114 mg, yield 88%); mp 246.6–248.0 °C; [α]25D = +757 (c 0.060, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.92 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 8.57 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 8.21 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 8.00 (dd, J = 8.2, 3.5 Hz, 2H), 7.96 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.56 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.54–7.47 (m, 3H), 7.43 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.38–7.27 (m, 4H), 7.25–7.16 (m, 2H), 7.07 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 6.87 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 6.63 (s, 1H), 4.62 (d, J = 15.7 Hz, 1H), 4.57 (d, J = 12.1 Hz, 1H), 3.78 (s, 1H), 3.69 (d, J = 13.9 Hz, 1H), 3.60 (d, J = 13.5 Hz, 1H), 3.02 (d, J = 15.1 Hz, 1H), 2.54 (d, J = 12.1 Hz, 1H), 1.50 (s, 9H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 176.3, 174.0, 170.3, 141.5, 139.9, 136.0, 135.4, 134.2, 133.8, 133.4, 133.0, 132.8, 131.5, 131.2, 130.9, 130.6, 130.4, 129.7, 129.1, 128.9, 128.8, 128.6, 128.4, 128.2, 127.3, 127.3, 127.2, 126.6, 126.5, 126.4, 126.4, 126.0, 124.2, 80.1, 67.2, 61.0, 59.1, 37.4, 28.4; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C43H37ClN3NiO3+ [M + H]+ 736.1871, found 736.1869. The dr was determined by LC/MS with an Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) (MeOH/H2O = 85/15, λ = 254 nm, 1.0 mL/min) tR (major diastereomer) = 29.882 min, tR (minor diastereomer) = 41.896 min, dr = 70:30.
Nickel(II)–(S)-17/(R)-phenylglycine Schiff base complex 23dd:
red solid (131 mg, yield 98%); mp 242.0–243.9 °C; [α]25D = −1752 (c 0.050, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.76 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.47 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 8.17 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 8.04–7.93 (m, 3H), 7.68 (dd, J = 7.1, 2.0 Hz, 2H), 7.56 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.54–7.47 (m, 4H), 7.45–7.40 (m, 2H), 7.33–7.22 (m, 7H), 7.05 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 6.71 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 6.06 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 4.92 (d, J = 12.2 Hz, 1H), 4.74 (s, 1H), 4.66 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 3.79 (d, J = 14.6 Hz, 1H), 3.68 (d, J = 14.0 Hz, 1H), 3.18 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 2.81 (d, J = 12.2 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 176.7, 174.4, 171.7, 140.7, 137.4, 135.7, 135.1, 133.7, 133.3, 132.7, 132.4, 132.1, 131.1, 130.8, 130.6, 129.5, 129.1, 128.8, 128.3, 128.3, 128.2, 128.0, 127.8, 127.6, 127.4, 127.1, 127.0, 126.9, 126.9, 126.3, 126.1, 126.0, 126.0, 126.0, 125.9, 125.7, 124.8, 74.5, 65.9, 61.6, 58.5; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C45H32ClN3NiO3Na+ [M + Na]+ 778.1378, found 778.1375. The dr was determined by LC/MS with an Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) (MeOH/H2O = 85/15, λ = 254 nm, 1.0 mL/min) tR (major diastereomer) = 26.473 min, tR (minor diastereomer) = 41.177 min, dr = 86:14.
Nickel(II)–(S)-17/(R)-4-methylphenylalanine Schiff base complex 23ee:
red solid (136 mg, yield 98%); mp 230.7–233.0 °C; [α]25D = −1978 (c 0.046, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.72 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 8.36 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 8.10 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 8.05–7.83 (m, 3H), 7.69–7.28 (m, 13H), 7.25–7.18 (m, 2H), 7.10 (dd, J = 23.5, 6.3 Hz, 2H), 6.65 (s, 1H), 4.55 (d, J = 13.7 Hz, 1H), 4.19 (s, 1H), 3.63 (d, J = 14.9 Hz, 1H), 3.18 (d, J = 13.6 Hz, 1H), 2.96 (d, J = 13.2 Hz, 1H), 2.73 (s, 3H), 2.69–2.49 (m, 3H), 2.40 (d, J = 11.5 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 177.0, 173.8, 169.3, 140.9, 136.8, 135.5, 134.9, 133.5, 133.2, 132.9, 132.4, 132.2, 131.9, 131.2, 131.0, 130.7, 130.6, 129.9, 129.2, 129.0, 128.9, 128.9, 128.6, 128.2, 128.2, 128.0, 127.9, 127.5, 127.1, 127.0, 127.0, 126.6, 126.6, 126.0, 125.9, 125.6, 124.8, 71.8, 65.3, 61.0, 57.3, 38.3, 21.2; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C47H37ClN3NiO3+ [M + H]+ 784.1871, found 784.1882. The dr was determined by LC/MS with an Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) (MeOH/H2O = 85/15, λ = 254 nm, 1.0 mL/min) tR (major diastereomer) = 37.976 min, tR (minor diastereomer) = not found, dr >99:1.
Nickel(II)–(R)-17/(S)-3,4-difluorophenylalanine Schiff base complex 23ff:
red solid (138 mg, yield 97%); mp 238.8–234.0 °C; [α]25D = +2044 (c 0.052, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.58 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 8.40 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 8.09 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.00 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.97 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.93 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.66–7.26 (m, 13H), 7.26–7.20 (m, 1H), 7.12–6.99 (m, 2H), 6.72 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 4.64 (d, J = 12.2 Hz, 1H), 4.20 (dd, J = 5.0, 3.5 Hz, 1H), 3.79 (d, J = 15.5 Hz, 1H), 3.33 (d, J = 13.9 Hz, 1H), 2.95 (dd, J = 13.6, 3.2 Hz, 1H), 2.86 (d, J = 13.9 Hz, 1H), 2.80 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 2.58 (dd, J = 13.0, 3.8 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 177.1, 174.1, 170.4, 141.4, 136.1, 135.2, 134.0, 133.7, 133.0, 132.8, 132.5, 131.5, 131.1, 130.8, 130.6, 129.5, 129.5, 129.3, 129.3, 128.6, 128.5, 128.4, 128.1, 127.8, 127.5, 127.4, 127.2, 127.0, 126.6, 126.4, 126.4, 126.4, 126.2, 125.2, 120.2 (d, J = 16.6 Hz), 117.5 (d, J = 16.5 Hz), 71.5, 66.0, 61.8, 58.4, 38.3; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C46H33ClF2N3NiO3+ [M + H]+ 806.1527, found 806.1538. The dr was determined by LC/MS with an Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) (MeOH/H2O = 85/15, λ = 254 nm, 1.0 mL/min) tR (major diastereomer) = 30.903 min, tR (minor diastereomer) = 53.744 min, dr = 97:3.
Nickel(II)–(S)-17/(R)-3,3-diphenylalanine Schiff base complex 23gg:
red solid (148 mg, yield 99%); mp 237.0–247.8 °C; [α]25D = −1460 (c 0.052, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.65 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.42 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 8.10 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.00–7.89 (m, 3H), 7.77–7.64 (m, 5H), 7.53–7.37 (m, 6H), 7.34 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.31 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 7.27 (dd, J = 9.0, 2.6 Hz, 1H), 7.25–7.21 (m, 3H), 7.15–7.06 (m, 3H), 7.06–6.99 (m, 2H), 6.97 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 6.73 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 4.67 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 4.57 (d, J = 12.2 Hz, 1H), 4.05 (d, J = 2.6 Hz, 1H), 3.93 (d, J = 15.4 Hz, 1H), 3.11 (d, J = 14.0 Hz, 1H), 2.73 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 1H), 2.69 (d, J = 6.1 Hz, 1H), 2.48 (d, J = 12.2 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 175.5, 173.9, 169.5, 141.1, 139.3, 139.0, 135.5, 134.9, 133.6, 133.2, 132.4, 132.1, 131.1, 130.8, 130.6, 129.8, 129.2, 128.9, 128.9, 128.7, 128.6, 128.4, 128.2, 128.0, 128.0, 127.8, 127.6, 127.5, 127.5, 127.2, 127.0, 126.9, 126.7, 126.7, 126.2, 126.0, 125.9, 125.9, 125.6, 124.5, 74.9, 65.5, 61.1, 57.5, 56.8; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C52H39ClN3NiO3+ [M + H]+: 846.2028, found 846.2026. The dr was determined by LC/MS with an Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) (MeOH/H2O = 85/15, λ = 254 nm, 1.0 mL/min) tR (major diastereomer) = 44.666 min, tR (minor diastereomer) = 80.637 min, dr = 90:10.
Nickel(II)–(R)-17/(S)-3-(2-thienyl)alanine Schiff base complex 23hh:
red solid (121 mg, yield 88%); mp 248.2–250.1 °C; [α]25D = +2300 (c 0.048, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.67 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 8.37 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 8.13 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 8.03–7.92 (m, 3H), 7.74 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 1H), 7.67–7.39 (m, 9H), 7.36 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 7.32–7.21 (m, 4H), 7.10 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 6.72 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 4.65 (d, J = 12.1 Hz, 1H), 4.20 (dd, J = 4.9, 2.3 Hz, 1H), 4.04 (d, J = 15.3 Hz, 1H), 3.39 (d, J = 13.9 Hz, 1H), 3.28 (dd, J = 14.6, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 3.12 (d, J = 13.9 Hz, 1H), 2.78 (dd, J = 14.9, 5.5 Hz, 2H), 2.56 (d, J = 12.1 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 177.5, 174.3, 170.3, 141.3, 137.7, 136.0, 135.3, 134.0, 133.7, 132.9, 132.7, 132.4, 131.5, 131.2, 131.0, 130.5, 129.5, 129.4, 129.3, 129.0, 128.8, 128.7, 128.6, 128.4, 128.3, 128.0, 127.9, 127.6, 127.5, 127.4, 127.2, 126.9, 126.5, 126.4, 126.1, 125.8, 125.3, 71.7, 66.0, 61.5, 58.0, 33.0; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C44H33ClN3NiO3S+ [M + H]+ 776.1279, found 776.1281. The dr was determined by LC/MS with an Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) (MeOH/H2O = 85/15, λ = 254 nm, 1.0 mL/min) tR (major diastereomer) = 27.524 min, tR (minor diastereomer) = 42.329 min, dr = 97:3.
Nickel(II)–(R)-17/(S)-propargylglycine Schiff base complex 23ii:
red solid (126 mg, yield 97%); mp 242.0–243.9 °C; [α]25D = +2700 (c 0.060, CHCl3); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.77 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.41 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 8.15 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.97 (dd, J = 8.2, 4.3 Hz, 3H), 7.59–7.44 (m, 7H), 7.37 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.33–7.25 (m, 2H), 7.28–7.21 (m, 1H), 7.19 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 6.95 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 6.67 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 4.82 (d, J = 12.2 Hz, 1H), 4.51 (d, J = 15.4 Hz, 1H), 3.92 (dd, J = 5.8, 2.7 Hz, 1H), 3.77–3.62 (m, 2H), 3.07 (d, J = 15.3 Hz, 1H), 3.01 (t, J = 2.6 Hz, 1H), 2.72 (d, J = 12.2 Hz, 1H), 2.63 (dt, J = 17.0, 2.6 Hz, 1H), 2.24 (ddd, J = 17.0, 5.8, 2.6 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 176.6, 174.0, 170.3, 141.0, 135.7, 135.0, 133.6, 133.3, 132.4, 132.1, 132.0, 131.1, 130.8, 130.6, 130.0, 129.1, 129.0, 128.9, 128.6, 128.4, 128.2, 128.0, 128.0, 127.5, 127.0, 127.0, 126.9, 126.9, 126.3, 126.1, 126.0, 126.0, 125.7, 124.9, 79.5, 74.2, 67.9, 66.3, 61.2, 58.7, 23.5; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C42H31ClN3NiO3+ [M + H]+ 718.1402, found 718.1397. The dr was determined by LC/MS with an Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 150 mm, 5 μm) (MeOH/H2O = 85/15, λ = 254 nm, 1.0 mL/min) tR (major diastereomer) = 19.027 min, tR (minor diastereomer) = 24.946 min, dr = 93:7.
(R)-4-Chlorophenylalanine 22j:
white solid (118 mg, yield 95%); mp 238.2–238.9 °C; [α]25D = +29.0 (c 0.048, MeOH); 1H NMR (400 MHz, D2O) δ 7.28 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.15 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 3.85 (t, J = 6.4 Hz, 1H), 3.12 (dd, J = 14.5, 5.1 Hz, 1H), 2.98 (dd, J = 14.6, 7.9 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, D2O) δ 170.7, 132.9, 132.2, 130.7, 128.8, 53.5, 34.6; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C9H10ClNO2Na+ [M + Na]+ 222.0292, found 222 0.0292. The ee was determined by HPLC with an Astec CHIROBIOTIC T chiral HPLC column (4.6 mm × 25 cm, 5 μm) (MeOH/H2O = 90/10, λ = 214 nm, 0.5 mL/min) tR (major enantiomer) = 21.173 min, tR (minor enantiomer) = not found, ee >99%.
(R)-n-Butylglycine 22y:
white solid (82 mg, yield 93%); mp >300 °C; [α]25D = −29.0 (c 0.056, MeOH); 1H NMR (400 MHz, D2O) δ 3.80 (t, J = 6.2 Hz, 1H), 1.88–1.71 (m, 3H), 1.32–1.19 (m, 4H), 0.78 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, D2O) δ 173.6, 53.8, 29.7, 26.2, 21.6, 12.9; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C6H14NO2+ [M + H]+ 132.1019, found 132.1018.
(R)-c-Butylglycine 22bb:
white solid (86 mg, yield 96%); mp >300 °C; [α]25D = −39.6 (c 0.048, MeOH); 1H NMR (400 MHz, D2O) δ 3.87 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 2.67 (h, J = 9.3 Hz, 1H), 2.06–1.63 (m, 6H).; 13C NMR (125 MHz, D2O) δ171.5, 56.7, 35.2, 25.0, 24.8, 17.3; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C6H12NO2+ [M + H]+ 130.0863, found 130.0862.
(S)-3-(2-Thienyl)alanine 22hh:
white solid (106 mg, yield 96%); mp 222.4–224.0 °C; [α]25D = −8.3 (c 0.048, MeOH); 1H NMR (400 MHz, D2O) δ 7.28 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 1H), 6.96–6.89 (m, 2H), 4.19 (t, J = 5.7 Hz, 1H), 3.54–3.20 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, D2O) δ 171.5, 135.2, 128.2, 127.7, 126.3, 54.3, 29.7; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C7H10NO2S+ [M + H]+ 172.0427, found 172.0427. The ee was determined by HPLC with an Astec CHIROBIOTIC T chiral HPLC column (4.6 mm × 25 cm, 5 μm) (MeOH/H2O = 80/20, λ = 214 nm, 1.0 mL/min) tR (major enantiomer) = 6.174 min, tR (minor enantiomer) = not found, ee >99%.
(R)-N-Cbz-n-Butylglycine 24y:
white solid (109 mg, yield 90%); mp 54.2–54.8 °C; [α]25D = +7.1 (c 0.056, MeOH); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 12.54 (s, 1H), 7.57 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.42–7.20 (m, 5H), 5.03 (s, 2H), 3.91 (td, J = 9.1, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 1.74–1.49 (m, 2H), 1.33–1.22 (m, 4H), 0.85 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 174.5, 156.6, 137.5, 128.8, 128.2, 128.2, 65.8, 54.2, 30.9, 28.2, 22.1, 14.2; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C14H20NO4+ [M + H]+ 266.1392, found 266.1381. The ee was determined by UFLC with a Chiralpak AD-H column (4.6 mm × 25 cm) (n-hexane +0.1% TFA/i-PrOH = 90/10, λ = 214 nm, 1.0 mL/min) tR (major enantiomer) = 31.147 min, tR (minor enantiomer) = not found, ee >99%.
(R)-N-Cbz-c-Butylglycine 24bb:
white solid (111 mg, yield 91%); mp 106.4–107.2 °C; [α]25D = −6.5 (c 0.062, MeOH); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 12.48 (s, 1H), 7.55 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.41–7.24 (m, 5H), 5.03 (s, 2H), 3.91 (t, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 2.67–2.50 (m, 1H), 2.03–1.59 (m, 6H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 173.4, 156.7, 137.5, 128.8, 128.3, 128.2, 65.9, 58.7, 36.6, 25.5, 25.3, 17.9; HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd for C14H18NO4+ [M + H]+ 264.1236, found 264.1225. The ee was determined by UFLC with a Chiralpak AD-H column (4.6 mm × 25 cm) (n-hexane +0.1% TFA/i-PrOH = 85/15, λ = 214 nm, 1.0 mL/min) tR (major enantiomer) = 21.294 min, tR (minor enantiomer) = 14.294, ee >99%.
Supporting Information

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.5b01292.

  • X-ray crystal structure of compound (Sa)(Rc)-23j (CIF)

  • 1H and 13C NMR spectra; LC/MS and HPLC experimental data (PDF)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgment


S.W., S.Z., J.W., Y.N., and H.L. received funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81302633, 21472209 and 91229204), the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (2012AA020302), and Major Project of Chinese National Programs for Fundamental Research and Development (2015CB910304).

References


This article references 23 other publications.

  1. 1.
    Soloshonok, V. A.; Cai, C.; Hruby, V. J.; Van Meervelt, L. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 1204512058, DOI: 10.1016/S0040-4020(99)00710-3
  2. 2.
    (a) Jurczak, J.; Golebiowski, A. Chem. Rev. 1989, 89, 149164, DOI: 10.1021/cr00091a004
    (b) Asymmetric Synthesis: Construction of Chiral Molecules Using Amino Acids; Coppola, G. M.; Schuster, H. F., Eds.; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1987.
    (c) Cowell, S. M.; Lee, Y. S.; Cain, J. P.; Hruby, V. J. Curr. Med. Chem. 2004, 11, 27852798, DOI: 10.2174/0929867043364270
    (d) Sonke, T.; Kaptein, B.; Schoemaker, H. E. Use of Enzymes in the Synthesis of Amino Acids. In Amino Acids, Peptides and Proteins in Organic Chemistry; Hughes, A. B., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2012; Vol. 1, pp 79118.
    (e) Mulzer, J. Chiral Pool Synthesis: From α-Amino Acids and Derivatives. In Comprehensive Chirality; Carreira, E. M.; Yamamoto, H., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2012; pp 122162.
  3. 3.
    Kwong, A. D.; Kauffman, R. S.; Hurter, P.; Mueller, P. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011, 29, 9931003, DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2020
  4. 4.
    Anderson, J. Future Oncol. 2009, 5, 433443, DOI: 10.2217/fon.09.24
  5. 5.
    Redic, K. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2013, 65, 10951106, DOI: 10.1111/jphp.12072
  6. 6.
    Augeri, D. J.; Robl, J. A.; Betebenner, D. A.; Magnin, D. R.; Khanna, A.; Robertson, J. G.; Wang, A. Y.; Simpkins, L. M.; Taunk, P.; Huang, Q.; Han, S. P.; Abboa-Offei, B.; Cap, M.; Xin, L.; Tao, L.; Tozzo, E.; Welzel, G. E.; Egan, D. M.; Marcinkeviciene, J.; Chang, S. Y.; Biller, S. A.; Kirby, M. S.; Parker, R. A.; Hamann, L. G. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 50255037, DOI: 10.1021/jm050261p
  7. 7.
    Perucca, E.; Yasothan, U.; Clincke, G.; Kirkpatrick, P. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2008, 7, 973974, DOI: 10.1038/nrd2764
  8. 8.

    For recent review articles, see:

    (a) Nájera, C.; Sansano, J. M. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 45844671, DOI: 10.1021/cr050580o
    (b) Vogt, H.; Bräse, S. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2007, 5, 406430, DOI: 10.1039/B611091F
    (c) Bera, K.; Namboothiri, I. N. N. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2014, 3, 12341260, DOI: 10.1002/ajoc.201402178
    (d) Metz, A. E.; Kozlowski, M. C. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 80, 17, DOI: 10.1021/jo502408z
  9. 9.

    For recent original papers, see:

    (a) Yang, K. S.; Rawal, V. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 1614816151, DOI: 10.1021/ja510135t
    (b) Yang, P.; Xu, H.; Zhou, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 1221012213, DOI: 10.1002/anie.201407744
    (c) Mita, T.; Sugawara, M.; Saito, K.; Sato, Y. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 30283031, DOI: 10.1021/ol501143c
  10. 10.
    (a) Breuer, M.; Ditrich, K.; Habicher, T.; Hauer, B.; Keβeler, M.; Stürmer, R.; Zelinski, T. Angew. Chem. 2004, 116, 806843, DOI: 10.1002/ange.200300599
    Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 788824.10.1002/anie.200300599
    (b) Fogassy, E.; Nógrádi, M.; Pálovics, E.; Schindler, J. Synthesis 2005, 15551568, DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-869903
  11. 11.
    (a) Park, N. H.; Teverovskiy, G.; Buchwald, S. L. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 220223, DOI: 10.1021/ol403209k
    (b) Boyall, D.; Frantz, D. E.; Carreira, E. M. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 26052606, DOI: 10.1021/ol026282k
    (c) Soloshonok, V. A.; Ohkura, H.; Yasumoto, M. J. Fluorine Chem. 2006, 127, 924929, DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluchem.2006.04.003
    (d) Soloshonok, V. A.; Ohkura, H.; Yasumoto, M. J. Fluorine Chem. 2006, 127, 930935, DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluchem.2006.04.004
  12. 12.
    (a) D’Arrigo, P.; Cerioli, L.; Servi, S.; Viani, F.; Tessaro, D. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2012, 2, 16061616, DOI: 10.1039/c2cy20106b
    (b) Yasukawa, K.; Hasemi, R.; Asano, Y. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2011, 353, 23282332, DOI: 10.1002/adsc.201100360
  13. 13.

    For seminal, first publications in this area, see:

    (a) Liang, J.; Ruble, J. C.; Fu, G. C. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 31543155, DOI: 10.1021/jo9803380
    (b) Qiao, S.; Fu, G. C. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 41684169, DOI: 10.1021/jo980624b
    (c) Gottwald, K.; Seebach, D. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 723738, DOI: 10.1016/S0040-4020(98)01064-3
  14. 14.

    For most recent contributions, see:

    (a) Berkessel, A.; Cleemann, F.; Mukherjee, S.; Müller, T. N.; Lex, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 807811, DOI: 10.1002/anie.200461442
    (b) Berkessel, A.; Mukherjee, S.; Cleemann, F.; Müller, T. N.; Lex, J. Chem. Commun. 2005, 18981900, DOI: 10.1039/b418666d
    (c) Yang, X.; Lu, G.; Birman, V. B. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 892895, DOI: 10.1021/ol902969j
    (d) Rodriguez-Docampo, Z.; Quigley, C.; Tallon, S.; Connon, S. J. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 24072414, DOI: 10.1021/jo202662d
    (e) Palacio, C.; Connon, S. J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 2013, 53985413, DOI: 10.1002/ejoc.201300451
  15. 15.
    (a) Metrano, A. J.; Miller, S. J. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 15421554, DOI: 10.1021/jo402828f
    (b) Oh, J. S.; Lee, J. W.; Ryu, T. H.; Lee, J. H.; Song, C. E. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012, 10, 10521055, DOI: 10.1039/C1OB06629C
    (c) Brown, S. A.; Parker, M.-C.; Turner, N. J. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2000, 11, 16871690, DOI: 10.1016/S0957-4166(00)00108-7
  16. 16.
    (a) Park, H.; Randhakumar, R.; Hong, J.; Ham, S.; Chin, J.; Kim, K. M. Chem. - Eur. J. 2008, 14, 99359942, DOI: 10.1002/chem.200801036
    (b) So, S. M.; Kim, H.; Mui, L.; Chin, J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 2012, 229241, DOI: 10.1002/ejoc.201101073
    (c) Huang, H.; Nandhakumar, R.; Choi, M.; Su, Z.; Kim, K. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 26532658, DOI: 10.1021/ja3105945
    (d) Park, H.; Kim, K. M.; Lee, A.; Ham, S.; Nam, W.; Chin, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 15181519, DOI: 10.1021/ja067724g
    (e) So, S. M.; Moozeh, K.; Lough, A. J.; Chin, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 829832, DOI: 10.1002/anie.201307410
  17. 17.
    (a) Soloshonok, V. A.; Hayashi, T.; Ishikawa, K.; Nagashima, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 10551058, DOI: 10.1016/S0040-4039(00)79964-3
    (b) Qiu, W.; Gu, X.; Soloshonok, V. A.; Carducci, M. D.; Hruby, V. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 145148, DOI: 10.1016/S0040-4039(00)01864-5
    (c) Soloshonok, V. A.; Kirilenko, A. G.; Fokina, N. A.; Shishkina, I. P.; Galushko, S. V.; Kukhar, V. P.; Svedas, V. K.; Kozlova, E. V. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1994, 5, 11191126, DOI: 10.1016/0957-4166(94)80063-4
    (d) Bravo, P.; Farina, A.; Frigerio, M.; Meille, S. V.; Viani, F.; Soloshonok, V. A. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1994, 5, 9871004, DOI: 10.1016/0957-4166(94)80049-9
  18. 18.
    Ellis, T. K.; Ueki, H.; Yamada, T.; Ohfune, Y.; Soloshonok, V. A. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 85728578, DOI: 10.1021/jo0616198
  19. 19.
    Lee, W. K.; Park, Y. S.; Beak, P. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 224234, DOI: 10.1021/ar8000662
  20. 20.
    Takeda, R.; Kawamura, A.; Kawashima, A.; Sato, T.; Moriwaki, H.; Izawa, K.; Akaji, K.; Wang, S.; Liu, H.; Aceña, J. L.; Soloshonok, V. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 1221412217, DOI: 10.1002/anie.201407944
  21. 21.
    Moore, J. L.; Taylor, S. M.; Soloshonok, V. A. ARKIVOC 2005, vi, 287292
  22. 22.
    (a) Ikunaka, M.; Maruoka, K.; Okuda, Y.; Ooi, T. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2003, 7, 644648, DOI: 10.1021/op034067t
    (b) Hawkins, J. M.; Fu, G. C. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 28202822, DOI: 10.1021/jo00364a041
  23. 23.

    Crystallographic structure of Ni(II) complex (Sa)(Rc)-23j: CCDC 1033608.

Citation data is made available by participants in CrossRef's Cited-by Linking service. For a more comprehensive list of citations to this article, users are encouraged to perform a search in SciFinder.

Explore by:

Metrics

Received 9 June 2015
Published online 9 September 2015
Published in print 16 October 2015